Rijksmuseum: part 2 – Wouwerman, Pieter -- De bestorming van Coevorden, 30 december 1672, 1672-1682
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In the foreground, a throng of soldiers advances toward the ramparts. They are depicted in varying states of action – some on horseback, charging forward; others on foot, attempting to scale ladders or engage directly with defenders. The artist has rendered them as small figures within the larger landscape, emphasizing the overwhelming scale of the military operation and the potential for individual anonymity amidst the chaos. A sense of urgency is conveyed through their postures and gestures, though specific expressions are difficult to discern due to the distance.
The composition’s depth is established by a receding perspective that leads the eye toward the distant horizon. The fortifications appear massive and imposing, dwarfing the figures below. This visual hierarchy reinforces the idea of an entrenched defense facing a determined assault. A flag flies atop one of the ramparts, likely signifying the defenders allegiance or command.
The use of light is noteworthy. While the overall tone is dark and somber, patches of illumination highlight key areas of action, drawing attention to the intensity of the fighting. The smoke obscures much of the scene, creating a sense of mystery and uncertainty about the outcome of the battle. This visual ambiguity contributes to the painting’s dramatic impact.
Subtly, theres an exploration of human endeavor against formidable obstacles. The sheer number of soldiers involved suggests a significant commitment of resources on both sides. The fortifications themselves represent not only physical defense but also the complexities of power and territorial control. The depiction of smoke and obscured vision hints at the limitations of knowledge and understanding in times of conflict, suggesting that even with preparation and strategy, outcomes remain uncertain.