Rijksmuseum: part 2 – Kessel, Jan van (1641-1680) -- Een waterval, 1660-1680
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a muted palette, primarily utilizing browns, greens, and grays to convey a somber, almost melancholic atmosphere. The light is diffused, filtering through a cloudy sky that contributes to the overall subdued mood. Patches of brighter white are used to depict the foam and spray generated by the waterfall, providing visual contrast and highlighting its movement.
The vegetation surrounding the falls appears dense and untamed. A large, dark mass of foliage rises on the left side of the composition, while a more detailed tree with visible branches extends from the right. These elements frame the central action and suggest an expansive, wild environment beyond what is immediately visible. In the distance, hints of human presence – likely buildings or structures – are discernible through gaps in the trees, subtly indicating a relationship between civilization and this natural setting.
The painting’s subtexts likely revolve around themes of natures power and its indifference to human concerns. The fallen tree trunk suggests vulnerability and decay within this powerful environment. The distant suggestion of human settlement implies an attempt at control or integration with the landscape, but it is dwarfed by the scale and force of the waterfall itself. There’s a sense of awe and perhaps even apprehension conveyed through the depiction; the scene isnt presented as idyllic, but rather as a demonstration of natures untamable essence. The artist seems to be exploring the relationship between humanity and the natural world, hinting at both its beauty and its potential for overwhelming force.