Abram Arkhipov – On the river Oka
1889. 42×78
Location: The State Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow (Государственная Третьяковская галерея).
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a muted palette; earth tones – ochres, browns, and grays – predominate, reflecting the natural environment and contributing to an overall sense of quietude. The light is diffuse, likely indicating either early morning or late afternoon, casting soft shadows that flatten perspective and unify the scene. Brushwork appears loose and textured, particularly in the depiction of the raft itself, conveying a sense of its rough construction and weathered condition.
The figures are rendered with a degree of realism, though their individual features are not sharply defined. Their clothing – simple shirts, caps, headscarves – indicates a working-class background. The presence of several children amongst the group suggests a multigenerational community reliant on the river for sustenance. A man stands slightly apart from the main cluster, observing the scene with an air of quiet contemplation; his posture and gaze suggest a leadership role or perhaps simply a detached perspective on the activity unfolding before him.
Beyond the raft, the river stretches into the distance, merging with a hazy horizon. Several figures are visible further along the bank, walking towards the viewer, adding depth to the composition and hinting at a larger community beyond the immediate group. The sparseness of the landscape – the absence of trees or buildings – emphasizes the vastness of the environment and the vulnerability of human existence within it.
Subtly, the painting conveys themes of labor, community, and resilience in the face of a harsh natural world. It is not a scene of dramatic action but rather one of quiet endurance; the figures are engaged in a repetitive task, their lives intertwined with the rhythms of the river. The muted colors and soft light evoke a sense of melancholy or nostalgia, suggesting a fading way of life. Theres an implicit commentary on the relationship between humanity and nature – a dependence that is both essential and precarious.