Sanchos ass stolen from under him John Gilbert (1817-1897)

The drawing presents a scene steeped in apparent absurdity and quiet despair. Here we observe two figures: one seated on a crude stool, his posture suggesting dejection or exhaustion; the other mounted atop a donkey, seemingly oblivious to the first mans state. The background is indistinct, hinting at a rocky terrain with minimal detail, which serves to isolate the central action.
The composition immediately draws attention to the disparity in status and demeanor between the two men. The seated figure’s slumped shoulders and bowed head convey a sense of loss or disappointment. His attire – a broad-brimmed hat and simple clothing – suggests a commoners station, further emphasizing his vulnerability. In contrast, the man on the donkey is clad in what appears to be armor, indicating a position of authority or at least a claim to it. The donkey itself becomes a symbolic element; its presence underscores the comical nature of the situation while simultaneously hinting at a burden being carried – perhaps representing responsibility or obligation.
The artist’s use of line work contributes significantly to the overall mood. The heavy, scratchy lines used for the seated figure accentuate his weariness and perhaps even a sense of entrapment. Conversely, the lines defining the armored man are more precise, suggesting a degree of control and detachment.
Subtextually, the drawing seems to explore themes of betrayal, loss, and the precariousness of social standing. The donkey’s theft – implied by the title – is not merely a physical event but likely represents a deeper sense of dispossession or the undermining of expectations. The armored mans indifference amplifies this feeling; he is seemingly unaffected by the seated figure’s plight, suggesting a lack of empathy or perhaps a deliberate disregard for his suffering.
The drawing avoids overt narrative cues, instead relying on visual juxtaposition and subtle gestures to convey its meaning. It invites contemplation about power dynamics, personal responsibility, and the often-humorous yet poignant realities of human experience.