Mikhail Avilov – Disarmament of parts of the Kolchak army. 1926 (Central Museum of the Armed Forces)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The figures themselves display a range of expressions and postures. Some appear weary and defeated, shoulders slumped, heads bowed. Others stand rigidly, seemingly awaiting instructions or processing their situation. A central figure, positioned slightly forward, appears to be overseeing the process; his posture suggests authority and control. The artist has rendered these men with varying degrees of detail, some appearing more individualized than others, perhaps to highlight the collective nature of their experience while acknowledging individual stories within it.
Behind the immediate group, a larger crowd is visible, stretching towards a distant building complex – likely barracks or temporary housing. This suggests a broader context of relocation and resettlement for these former soldiers. A red flag is prominently displayed on the right side of the canvas, its presence serving as a symbolic marker of the new political order.
The color palette is dominated by cool tones – blues, whites, and grays – which contribute to the overall sense of coldness and austerity. The snow-covered ground reflects this frigid atmosphere, while patches of warmer colors in the background buildings offer a subtle contrast, hinting at potential hope or future stability.
Subtly, the painting conveys more than just the literal act of disarmament. It speaks to themes of defeat, transition, and the imposition of new power structures following conflict. The subdued expressions on the faces of the men suggest not only physical exhaustion but also a psychological burden – the loss of purpose, identity, or perhaps even hope. The composition’s emphasis on the sheer volume of surrendered weapons underscores the magnitude of the shift in power dynamics. Ultimately, the work functions as a visual record of a specific historical moment and an exploration of its human consequences.