Felix Philippoteaux – General De La Morliere Receiving the Surrender of Antwerp, 29th November 1792
1837 oil on canvas
Location: Palace of Versailles (Château de Versailles), Paris.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition is structured around a clear hierarchy. The French officer occupies the visual apex, bathed in a softer light that separates him from the surrounding chaos. He stands within a defined space created by the pavilion’s tent, emphasizing his authority. Around him, other officers observe the event with varying degrees of formality and emotion – some appear attentive, others seem detached or even weary.
Beyond this central group, a larger assembly of soldiers is visible, both mounted and on foot. They are positioned in a manner that suggests a controlled dispersal, a transition from combat to occupation. The presence of artillery pieces and scattered debris reinforces the recent nature of hostilities. In the background, a fleet of ships lies anchored on the water, symbolizing naval support and control over the harbor.
The artist’s use of light and shadow contributes significantly to the narrative. The subdued lighting creates an atmosphere of solemnity and resignation. The overcast sky conveys a sense of melancholy and the weight of defeat. The limited palette – dominated by browns, grays, and muted greens – further reinforces this mood.
Subtleties within the scene hint at deeper meanings. The dilapidated state of the fortifications suggests not only military failure but also the fragility of power. The expressions on the faces of the defeated soldiers are complex; they convey a mixture of shame, exhaustion, and perhaps even resentment. The presence of civilians in the background subtly reminds the viewer of the human cost of war.
The painting seems to be less about celebrating victory than it is about documenting a moment of transition – the end of one era and the beginning of another. It portrays not just a military surrender but also the complex emotions and consequences that accompany such events, offering a glimpse into the political and social upheaval of the time.