Felix Philippoteaux – Lamartine rejects the red flag in 1848
oil on canvas
Location: Museum of Petit Palais (Musée du Petit-Palais), Paris.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist has employed a dramatic chiaroscuro effect, with strong contrasts between light and shadow that heighten the emotional intensity of the moment. The illumination focuses primarily on the central figures and the immediate vicinity, leaving much of the background shrouded in relative darkness. This technique draws attention to the interaction between the man and the flag-bearer, emphasizing the symbolic weight of their encounter.
The crowd is a heterogeneous mix of social classes; some are dressed in working attire, others appear more affluent. Several individuals brandish flags – primarily red – suggesting revolutionary fervor or political dissent. The presence of military personnel, identifiable by their uniforms and weaponry, indicates an attempt to maintain order amidst the chaos. Scattered debris and overturned objects litter the ground, further contributing to the atmosphere of upheaval.
The architectural backdrop provides a sense of scale and permanence, contrasting sharply with the transient nature of the events depicted. The building’s classical style suggests established authority and tradition, which are seemingly challenged by the revolutionary sentiment expressed in the crowds actions.
Subtleties within the composition suggest deeper layers of meaning. The man rejecting the flag might be interpreted as a symbol of moderation or resistance to radical change. His gesture is not one of aggression but of refusal, implying a principled stance against what he perceives as an undesirable political direction. Conversely, the figure presenting the red flag embodies revolutionary ideals and potentially represents the aspirations of those seeking social transformation. The overall scene seems to capture a pivotal moment of ideological conflict – a clash between established power and burgeoning dissent – within a society undergoing profound political transition.