Joachim Wtewael – The Wedding of Peleus and Thetis
1612. 36x42
Location: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstown.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The arrangement of figures suggests a hierarchical structure. At the apex of the scene, amidst swirling clouds, several winged figures are positioned, seemingly observing or participating in the festivities from above. One figure, identifiable by their attributes – a trumpet and regal posture – appears to be a deity, presiding over the event. Below them, a multitude of male figures populate the foreground and midground. Many are depicted as partially nude, exhibiting muscular physiques that emphasize physical prowess and vitality. Their expressions range from jovial laughter to intense concentration on musical performance; several play instruments like pipes and lyres.
The central pair – a man and woman – are positioned near the table, engaged in a gesture of mutual affection. The woman’s pose is particularly striking: she leans into the man, her body twisting gracefully as if caught mid-movement. This dynamic posture contrasts with the more static poses of many other figures, drawing attention to their union.
The lower portion of the painting introduces an element of the fantastical and potentially unsettling. Several figures with animalistic features – goat legs, horns, and fur – are present, some participating in the feast while others observe from the periphery. A canine creature is also visible near the bottom edge, adding to the sense of a world where human and mythical realms intersect.
The color palette is rich and warm, dominated by earthy tones of green, brown, and ochre, punctuated by flashes of gold and crimson. The light source appears diffuse, illuminating the scene evenly and contributing to the overall atmosphere of abundance and celebration. However, the presence of darker shadows in certain areas creates a sense of depth and complexity, hinting at underlying tensions or hidden meanings.
Subtleties within the painting suggest layers of meaning beyond a simple depiction of a wedding. The inclusion of figures with animalistic features could symbolize primal instincts or untamed forces that are present even during moments of civilized celebration. The hierarchical arrangement of figures – the deities above, the humans below – might allude to the relationship between mortals and the divine. Ultimately, the work presents a complex tableau of human interaction, mythology, and the interplay between order and chaos.