Part 5 Prado Museum – Sevilla y Romero, Juan de -- El rico epulón y el pobre Lázaro
Siglo XVII, 110 cm x 160 cm, Lienzo, Lienzo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The lighting focuses primarily on this group, highlighting their faces and clothing, creating a sense of warmth and indulgence. The table itself is laden with food and silver tableware, signifying abundance and prosperity. A small dog sits attentively beneath the table, further reinforcing the atmosphere of domestic comfort and privilege.
In sharp opposition to this scene of plenty, a figure lies prostrate at the lower right edge of the canvas. He is scantily clad, his body emaciated and vulnerable. Another man, dressed in darker clothing and holding what appears to be a staff or club, stands over him with an expression that conveys indifference or even disdain. The contrast between the richly adorned interior and the bareness of this figure’s surroundings underscores the disparity in their circumstances.
The background is somewhat obscured by heavy draperies, but glimpses of a garden can be seen through an arched opening, suggesting access to further luxuries and natural beauty – privileges denied to the suffering individual. The architectural details are elaborate, with sculpted reliefs and decorative elements that contribute to the overall impression of grandeur.
Subtly, the artist uses spatial arrangement to reinforce the thematic divide. The figures at the table are positioned closer to the viewer, drawing attention to their actions and expressions, while the impoverished man is relegated to the periphery, visually diminishing his importance within the narrative. This deliberate placement serves to emphasize the social inequalities inherent in the depicted situation, prompting reflection on themes of charity, compassion, and the consequences of indifference. The overall effect is one of poignant juxtaposition, inviting contemplation about the moral implications of wealth and poverty.