Ernest Lawson – harlem river at high bridge c1915
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a river, rendered in varying shades of green and brown, reflecting the overcast sky above. Its surface appears somewhat agitated, suggesting movement or current. A small vessel, likely a barge or tugboat, is positioned mid-river, its presence hinting at industrial activity along the waterway.
The bridge itself is a significant element; its arches are robust and imposing, constructed from what seems to be stone or brick. It serves as a visual anchor, connecting the two sides of the landscape. The land on either side rises steeply, covered in dense vegetation – a mix of trees, shrubs, and rocky outcrops. These areas appear textured with an almost impasto application of paint, conveying a sense of ruggedness and natural growth.
The color palette is muted, primarily consisting of earth tones – browns, greens, grays – with touches of pale blue in the sky and water. The artist employed a broken brushstroke technique, creating a vibrant surface that captures the play of light across the scene. This approach lends an impressionistic quality to the work, softening the edges of forms and contributing to a sense of atmospheric perspective.
Beyond the immediate depiction of landscape and infrastructure, subtexts emerge concerning industrialization and urban expansion. The bridge, while functional, also signifies human intervention in the natural environment. The presence of the vessel suggests commerce and transportation, indicative of an evolving economy. The dense vegetation juxtaposed with the man-made structures implies a tension between nature and progress.
The spire rising above the cityscape introduces a note of aspiration or perhaps institutional power – its precise function remains ambiguous within the context of the painting. Overall, the work conveys a sense of place – a specific location undergoing transformation, where natural beauty coexists with burgeoning industrial activity.