Arnold Rice – Seer, Arnold Rice,1995 - 1600x1200 - ID 23448 - PREMIUM
Album navigation:

На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Dominating the upper portion of the canvas is a swirling vortex rendered in red and white, evoking notions of cyclical time, revelation, or even a spiraling descent into consciousness. Below this, a pale form resembling a stylized head appears, its features reduced to essential lines – an elongated nose, a suggestion of eyes, and a mouth that seems both open and closed simultaneously. This figure’s posture implies introspection or perhaps a state of passive reception.
The lower half of the painting is characterized by more fragmented forms. A large, central shape, vaguely reminiscent of a distorted human profile, is constructed from yellow and blue lines, creating an impression of tension and instability. A prominent eye, rendered with stark white outlines against a dark background, stares directly outward, suggesting observation or perhaps a gaze directed back at the viewer. This element introduces a sense of unsettling directness.
Scattered throughout the composition are small, geometric shapes – crosses and squares – that appear almost like coded symbols. These elements contribute to the painting’s enigmatic quality, hinting at hidden meanings or systems of knowledge. The presence of what appears to be handwritten text along the right edge further reinforces this sense of a personal code or private language.
The color palette is deliberately jarring; the juxtaposition of warm and cool tones creates visual friction, mirroring the internal conflict suggested by the fragmented forms. The brushwork is loose and expressive, adding to the overall feeling of immediacy and emotional intensity.
Ultimately, the painting resists easy interpretation. It seems less concerned with depicting a concrete subject than with conveying a sense of psychic turbulence, symbolic communication, or perhaps an attempt to visualize the intangible processes of perception and understanding.