George Morland – Selling Guinea Pigs
c.1789. 76×64
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The woman’s attire suggests a degree of respectability, though not extravagance. Her expression is difficult to decipher definitively – it could convey either polite tolerance or a subtle air of condescension. The childrens clothing mirrors this ambiguity; they are dressed adequately but lack the refinement seen in their mother.
A basket containing several small animals lies near the kneeling man, drawing immediate attention and providing context for the scene. These creatures, likely guinea pigs given their size and coloration, appear to be the objects of exchange. The ground is uneven and overgrown with vegetation, contributing to a sense of rural simplicity and perhaps a touch of neglect.
The background is rendered in looser brushstrokes, depicting foliage and glimpses of a distant structure under a cloudy sky. This creates depth while simultaneously drawing focus back to the figures in the foreground. The lighting is dramatic; it highlights the faces of the man and children, casting the woman in shadow, which subtly reinforces the power dynamic at play.
Subtextually, the painting seems to explore themes of commerce, class disparity, and rural life. The transaction itself suggests a moment of economic necessity for the man, while the woman’s presence implies a social distance between them. The children represent innocence and perhaps the future – their expressions hinting at an understanding of the world beyond their immediate surroundings. The guinea pigs themselves become symbolic; they are small, vulnerable creatures being exchanged as commodities, potentially representing broader societal vulnerabilities or the exploitation inherent in economic exchange. The overall impression is one of quiet observation, capturing a fleeting moment within a larger social narrative.