Henry (Fussli Fuseli – Midgard Serpent
1788
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
To his right, another male figure is depicted seated on a small vessel, seemingly caught within the chaos. This individual’s expression conveys a mixture of apprehension and determination as he observes the central figures interaction with the serpent. The contrast in their physiques – the powerful build of the first man versus the more compact form of the second – hints at differing roles or levels of involvement in the unfolding drama.
The serpentine creature itself is rendered with an emphasis on scale and power. Its body coils upwards, emerging from a dark, churning sea that fills the lower portion of the canvas. The artist employed a loose brushstroke to convey the water’s movement and the serpents immense size, creating a sense of overwhelming force. A smaller figure can be seen in the distance, perched on what appears to be a rocky outcrop, seemingly observing the events unfolding below.
The color palette is largely restricted to earthy tones – browns, ochres, and grays – which contribute to the overall atmosphere of struggle and peril. The limited use of light focuses attention on the central figures and the serpent’s head, highlighting their importance within the narrative.
Subtextually, the painting seems to explore themes of order versus chaos, humanitys confrontation with primordial forces, and the potential for both triumph and vulnerability in the face of overwhelming odds. The serpent likely symbolizes a destructive or chaotic power – perhaps representing the untamed aspects of nature or the dangers inherent in the unknown. The central figure’s struggle suggests an attempt to assert control over these forces, while the seated man embodies a more passive role, caught within the consequences of this conflict. The distant observer could represent a detached perspective on human endeavors and their relationship with the larger world.