Rijksmuseum: part 4 – Brugghen, Hendrick ter -- De ongelovige Thomas, 1622
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The older man, distinguished by his age and spectacles, reaches out with a hesitant touch, his fingers probing the wound on the central figure’s palm. His face is etched with a mixture of skepticism and cautious acceptance. The gesture itself is laden with significance; it represents a tangible validation of something previously doubted.
Flanking this primary interaction are two other men. One, positioned to the left, leans forward intently, his gaze fixed on the scene unfolding before him. He seems to be absorbing the moment, perhaps questioning or understanding its implications. The second man, situated slightly behind and to the right, displays a more reserved demeanor, his face partially obscured by a green cloth draped around his neck. His posture suggests a degree of detachment, as if observing from a distance.
The artist employed a dramatic use of chiaroscuro – a stark contrast between light and shadow – to heighten the emotional intensity of the scene. The figures are illuminated by an unseen source, casting deep shadows that obscure portions of their faces and bodies. This technique not only directs the viewers attention to key elements but also contributes to a sense of solemnity and introspection.
The color palette is similarly restrained, dominated by earthy tones – browns, ochres, and muted reds – that reinforce the gravity of the subject matter. The limited use of brighter colors, such as the white cloth and the yellow drape on the older man’s shoulder, serves to highlight specific details and draw the eye towards them.
Beyond the literal depiction of a moment of verification, the painting explores themes of faith, doubt, and the human need for tangible proof. It suggests that belief is not always easily attained and that even those closest to divine figures may require evidence to overcome their skepticism. The composition’s intimacy – the close proximity of the figures and the directness of their gaze – invites viewers to contemplate the complexities of faith and the challenges of accepting what cannot be immediately understood.