Kenneth Riley – lrsRileyKenneth-DogDancers
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a man adorned with an extensive array of feathers, animal skins, and symbolic objects. His face is painted with dark pigments, emphasizing his features and potentially signifying spiritual or tribal identity. He holds a ceremonial staff topped with what seems to be a raven’s head, suggesting a connection to ancestral spirits or shamanistic practices. A large shield decorated with an image of animals – possibly bears – is secured across his chest, further enriching the symbolic layers of the presentation. The mans posture is dynamic; he leans forward slightly, as if in motion, and his arms are extended towards two tall poles draped with feathers, creating a sense of movement and ritualistic energy.
The artist’s use of color contributes to the overall effect. Earth tones – browns, ochres, and blacks – predominate, evoking a feeling of connection to nature and tradition. The white background behind the figure creates contrast, highlighting his form and emphasizing the symbolic elements of his attire. Brushstrokes are visible, lending texture and immediacy to the work.
Subtexts within this presentation seem to revolve around themes of identity, spirituality, and cultural heritage. The elaborate costume suggests a position of importance or authority within a tribal structure. The animal imagery – raven, bears – likely carries significant symbolic meaning related to power, protection, or kinship. The act of dancing itself could represent communication with the spirit world, celebration of life, or reaffirmation of communal bonds.
The work prompts consideration about representations of indigenous cultures and the complexities inherent in portraying traditions from an external perspective. It is likely intended as a respectful depiction of ceremonial practices, but questions regarding authenticity and cultural appropriation remain relevant when considering its context within broader artistic and historical narratives.