Part 6 Prado Museum – Teniers, David -- Monos en la escuela
1660, 25 cm x 34 cm, Lámina de cobre, Óleo. David Teniers
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see several monkeys seated at a long table, ostensibly students. Some appear to be diligently copying from open books, while others seem distracted or mischievous. One primate, clad in blue, is bent over a book with an expression of intense concentration, while another, dressed in red, appears to be playfully disrupting the lesson. The arrangement suggests a classroom setting, albeit one populated by unconventional pupils.
A dog, also anthropomorphized and costumed, kneels before a seated monkey who seems to be acting as a teacher or instructor. This interaction introduces an element of authority and instruction within the primate society. A book lies open on the floor near the kneeling dog, further reinforcing the theme of learning and scholarship.
The background reveals more details about this peculiar world. Shelves are laden with vessels, utensils, and what appear to be academic materials – scrolls, books, and writing implements. The presence of a coat of arms affixed to the wall hints at a system of governance or lineage within this primate society. A red hat is casually draped over a nearby object, adding a touch of levity to the scene.
The painting’s subtexts revolve around satire and social commentary. By depicting primates mimicking human behaviors – learning, teaching, dressing in formal attire – the artist invites viewers to question the seriousness of societal conventions and institutions. The costumes themselves are significant; they suggest an examination of power structures and the performative aspects of identity. The overall effect is one of humorous observation, prompting reflection on the absurdity of human pretensions and the universality of certain behaviors across species. The scene’s ambiguity – the lack of a clear narrative or moral – allows for multiple interpretations, encouraging viewers to engage with the work on their own terms.