Gregory Gillespie – art 136
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A man, identifiable by his lab coat and glasses, stands on the left side of the frame, gesturing towards a creature that seems to be a hybrid – possessing characteristics of both avian and mammalian forms. His expression is neutral, almost clinical, suggesting an objective observation rather than emotional engagement. To his right stands a younger woman, also wearing what appears to be institutional attire, her smile appearing strained or forced within the context of the scene.
On the opposite side of the table, another figure – an older woman with spectacles and a similarly formal garment – cradles a similar hybrid creature in her arms. Her gaze is directed downwards, seemingly focused on the being she holds. A fourth individual, partially obscured by the architectural elements, appears to be observing from behind them.
The creatures themselves are rendered with meticulous detail, highlighting their unnatural combination of features. The lighting is stark and even, contributing to the overall atmosphere of coldness and scientific scrutiny.
Subtexts within this work revolve around themes of experimentation, manipulation of nature, and the unsettling consequences of scientific progress. The hybrid creatures suggest a deliberate intervention in the natural order, raising questions about ethics and responsibility. The figures’ detached demeanor implies a normalization of such interventions, potentially critiquing societal acceptance of practices that challenge fundamental boundaries.
The monochrome palette reinforces the sense of historical distance and objectivity, while also contributing to the overall feeling of unease. The architectural setting – the brickwork platform – suggests an institutional context, further emphasizing the clinical nature of the depicted event. Ultimately, the painting invites contemplation on humanity’s relationship with science, nature, and the potential for unintended consequences when attempting to control or alter the natural world.