George Stubbs – Freeman, the Earl of Clarendon’s gamekeeper, with a dying doe and hound
1800. 102×127
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The central figure of the man commands attention with his direct gaze towards the viewer. His clothing – a tailored coat and breeches – suggests a position of authority or at least belonging within a landed gentry class. He is not depicted as triumphant; instead, there’s an element of weariness in his expression, perhaps even regret. The way he holds the deers head suggests a degree of compassion rather than simple dominance.
The doe itself occupies a significant portion of the foreground. Its posture conveys vulnerability and exhaustion. The muted tones used to render its fur contribute to the overall sense of fragility and impending loss. The dogs, positioned on either side of the deer, are rendered with considerable detail; their expressions seem to reflect a mixture of excitement and confusion at the unfolding event. One dog leans into the doe, almost as if offering comfort.
The background is deliberately obscured by shadow, creating an atmosphere of mystery and isolation. A glimpse of water can be seen through the trees, hinting at a broader landscape beyond the immediate scene. The limited palette – dominated by browns, greens, and grays – reinforces the somber mood.
Beyond the literal depiction of a hunt, the painting seems to explore themes of mortality, responsibility, and the complex relationship between humans and nature. The mans presence suggests an imposed order upon the natural world, yet his expression hints at the moral weight of that power. The dying deer serves as a poignant symbol of loss and the inevitable cycle of life and death. It is possible to interpret this scene not merely as a record of a hunt but as a meditation on the consequences of human intervention in the wilderness.