European art; part 1 – Albert Berg Temple O Yawuts 1860 120769 1124
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist employed a linear technique, using hatching and cross-hatching to define form and suggest tonal variation. This approach lends a delicate quality to the work, emphasizing the precision of the architectural rendering. The lines are generally confident and controlled, though some areas exhibit a looser, more gestural quality, particularly in the depiction of surrounding vegetation.
To the left of the main structure, a low wall or barrier is visible, partially obscuring the view and creating a sense of enclosure. This element contributes to the feeling that the building is a secluded or sacred space. To the right, a smaller pavilion or annex stands apart from the primary edifice, connected by what seems to be a pathway or bridge. The placement of this secondary structure suggests a deliberate arrangement of spaces within a larger complex.
The surrounding landscape appears deliberately simplified; it lacks detailed foliage and instead presents a suggestion of natural elements through sparse lines. This restraint directs attention towards the architectural subject and reinforces its importance. The overall effect is one of quiet contemplation, inviting the viewer to consider the buildings significance within its environment.
Subtly embedded in the composition are indications of the artist’s process: notations appear in the lower left and right corners, likely recording dates or other relevant information. These markings offer a glimpse into the creation of the drawing and underscore its status as a study or preliminary sketch rather than a finished artwork.