William Hogarth – Self-Portrait
c.1735. 55×51
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s elaborate wig, meticulously arranged in voluminous curls, is a prominent feature, indicative of his social standing and adherence to contemporary fashion. His clothing – a coat with a high collar and a loosely tied cravat – further reinforces this impression of refinement. The palette employed for the garments leans towards muted browns and creams, creating a sense of understated elegance.
A significant element within the composition is the artist’s paraphernalia held in his left hand. A dark leather apron or satchel is visible, overflowing with paintbrushes and palettes bearing traces of color. This detail immediately establishes the subjects profession as an artist, grounding the portrait in the realm of creative production. The inclusion of these tools isnt merely descriptive; it subtly alludes to the act of self-representation itself – the artist portraying himself while simultaneously engaging in the very practice he embodies.
The facial expression is complex and nuanced. There’s a certain gravity in his features, perhaps tinged with melancholy or weariness. The slight downturn of the mouth and the furrowing of the brow suggest an internal struggle or a thoughtful assessment of circumstances. This isnt a portrait intended to convey unadulterated joy; instead, it offers a glimpse into a more complex emotional landscape.
The application of paint is loose and expressive, particularly evident in the rendering of the wig and the background. The visible brushstrokes contribute to a sense of immediacy and informality, contrasting with the formality of the subject’s attire and social status. This stylistic choice might be interpreted as an assertion of artistic freedom or a rejection of overly rigid conventions.
Subtly, the portrait conveys themes of identity, profession, and self-awareness. The artists deliberate inclusion of his tools suggests not only his trade but also a commentary on the nature of representation itself – the act of creating an image to define oneself. The somber expression hints at the burdens and complexities inherent in artistic creation and the challenges of self-perception.