Part 3 Prado Museum – Ribera, José de -- Martirio de San Felipe
1639, 234 cm x 234 cm, Lienzo, Óleo.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Surrounding this central figure is a throng of individuals, their reactions ranging from active participation in the torture to expressions of detached observation or muted distress. Several figures are directly involved in securing and manipulating the ropes that bind the victim, their faces obscured by shadow or rendered with an impassive quality. Others stand back, some exhibiting signs of empathy – a woman on the left clutches a child close, her face etched with worry – while others appear indifferent or even curious. This variety of responses contributes to the complexity of the narrative and invites contemplation about the nature of cruelty and complicity.
The lighting is dramatic, employing strong contrasts between light and shadow (chiaroscuro) to heighten the emotional impact. The illuminated areas focus attention on the victim’s body and the faces of those most directly involved in his suffering, while darker regions obscure details and create a sense of foreboding. This technique amplifies the feeling of claustrophobia and intensifies the viewers perception of the scenes violence.
The background is sparsely detailed, suggesting an enclosed space – perhaps a prison or public square – and further isolating the event from any broader context. The limited color palette, dominated by earthy tones and punctuated by occasional flashes of red in the clothing of some onlookers, reinforces the somber mood.
Beyond the immediate depiction of physical torment, the painting seems to explore themes of religious persecution, political oppression, and the psychological toll of witnessing violence. The ambiguous nature of the setting and the diverse reactions of the crowd allow for multiple interpretations, prompting reflection on the dynamics of power, faith, and human behavior in extreme circumstances. There is a sense that this is not merely an isolated incident but a representation of systemic injustice and suffering.