Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1943-1961 – 1961 Le dВjeuner sur lherbe (Manet) 6
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see three human-like forms and an animal, likely a dog, arranged in a triangular configuration. The figures are rendered with simplified shapes and angular lines, characteristic of a fractured or deconstructed style. Their bodies appear fragmented, almost as if assembled from geometric components. Facial features are minimal; the expressions are ambiguous, lending them a detached quality. One figure reclines on what seems to be a draped cloth, while another sits upright, facing forward. The dog is positioned centrally, its posture suggesting alertness or perhaps apprehension.
The setting itself is suggested rather than realistically depicted. Trees rise vertically along the sides of the canvas, their forms reduced to dark, columnar shapes. A sense of enclosure and confinement pervades the scene.
Subtextually, the work seems to explore themes of alienation and disconnection. The figures’ lack of interaction and their stylized representation suggest a breakdown in conventional social dynamics or emotional connection. The muted color scheme reinforces this feeling of detachment, while the fragmented forms hint at an underlying instability or disruption. The dogs presence introduces an element of naturalness that contrasts with the artificiality of the human figures, potentially highlighting the divide between humanity and nature, or perhaps commenting on a loss of innocence.
The overall effect is one of psychological unease, achieved through the deliberate distortion of form and the suppression of traditional narrative cues. The painting doesnt offer easy answers; instead, it invites contemplation about the complexities of human relationships and the fragility of perception.