National Museum of Women in the Arts – art 109
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Flanking this central figure are two rifles, positioned vertically along either side. One rifle leans against the frame, while the other is held in what appears to be a gloved hand extending from behind the central figure. The inclusion of these weapons introduces an immediate element of threat and potential violence. A broom is also present, held similarly to the second rifle, adding another layer of symbolic complexity – perhaps suggesting both labor and defense.
Behind the primary figure, a grid-like arrangement of portraits is visible. These faces are rendered in a more conventional style than the central figure, yet they share a similar skin tone and appear to be smiling broadly. The repetition creates an unsettling sense of uniformity and potentially alludes to a collective identity or historical context. Text fragments are partially obscured within this background grid, adding another layer of cryptic information that resists easy interpretation.
Foregrounded within a rectangular opening in the central figure’s body is a domestic scene: a woman holding a baby stands before a picket fence. The womans expression conveys an air of forced cheerfulness, while the child appears oblivious to the unsettling context surrounding them. This miniature tableau seems deliberately placed to contrast with the larger, more menacing imagery.
The entire composition is set within a shallow box-like frame, and the background is filled with what looks like cotton or batting material, creating a sense of depth and texture. The overall effect is one of deliberate provocation, prompting reflection on themes of power, identity, history, and representation. The artist seems to be engaging with uncomfortable truths through a combination of humor, caricature, and unsettling symbolism. The work resists straightforward interpretation, instead inviting viewers to grapple with its complex layers of meaning and the historical context it likely references.