Sebastiano Ricci – The Battle of the Lapiths and Centaurs
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The figures on the left side of the canvas appear to be predominantly human, though they display an exaggerated musculature characteristic of classical sculpture. They are locked in combat with creatures possessing the torsos of men and the bodies and legs of horses. The centaurs, as these equine-human hybrids might be called, exhibit a raw, animalistic power, their movements less controlled than those of their human adversaries. A woman, clad in flowing drapery, is caught amidst the fray; her expression suggests terror or distress rather than active participation in the battle.
The color palette is dominated by warm tones – ochres, reds, and browns – which amplify the sense of heat and violence. The limited use of cooler colors, particularly blues and greens, serves to highlight specific figures and add depth to the composition. Light falls unevenly across the scene, creating dramatic contrasts between illuminated areas and deep shadows that obscure details and heighten the feeling of turmoil.
In the background, a classical architectural structure – a portico with columns – is visible, partially obscured by trees. This element introduces an air of civilization and order, sharply contrasting with the barbarity unfolding in the foreground. The presence of this architecture suggests a disruption of established societal norms or a fall from grace. It may also represent a symbolic setting for the conflict, perhaps a royal wedding or celebration that has been violently interrupted.
The subtext of the painting seems to explore themes of civilization versus savagery, order versus chaos, and the potential for violence even within seemingly civilized societies. The battle itself could be interpreted as an allegory for internal struggles – the clash between reason and instinct, or perhaps a representation of societal upheaval. The inclusion of the woman suggests vulnerability and the disruption of domesticity by forces beyond her control. Overall, the work conveys a sense of profound loss and the fragility of order in the face of primal urges.