На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The table surface itself is not depicted realistically; instead, it’s suggested through broad strokes of orange and yellow, intersected by areas of purple and green that create a sense of spatial ambiguity. The background is similarly abstract, composed of horizontal bands of orange, yellow, and white, evoking the impression of a sunset or dawn sky.
The artists use of color is particularly striking. The intense hues are not blended smoothly but rather applied in distinct blocks, contributing to a feeling of dynamism and visual fragmentation. This approach moves away from naturalistic representation, prioritizing expressive qualities over mimetic accuracy.
Subtly, the arrangement seems to suggest a sense of domesticity or ritual, albeit one filtered through an intensely subjective lens. The objects are recognizable as everyday items, but their presentation – the flattened perspective, the bold colors, and the simplified forms – transforms them into symbols rather than mere representations. There’s a deliberate distancing from direct observation; instead, the artist seems to be exploring the emotional resonance of these commonplace objects through an abstracted visual language. The overall effect is one of controlled energy and heightened perception, hinting at underlying tensions between order and chaos.