На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The architecture is stylized; details are reduced to essential shapes and planes. Buildings are depicted with flat facades in hues of blue, white, and terracotta, their forms interlocking in an almost abstract manner. The roofs are predominantly red-tiled, contributing to the overall warmth of the color scheme. A series of balustrades and walkways define the terraces, creating a sense of layered depth within the composition.
The sky is painted with broad strokes of blue, suggesting a bright, clear day. However, the application of paint is somewhat rough, lending an impressionistic quality to the atmosphere. The lower portion of the painting features what seems to be a canal or waterway, its surface reflecting the colors above in distorted patterns. This reflective element adds another layer of visual complexity and contributes to the overall sense of depth.
Subtly, theres a feeling of isolation conveyed by the lack of human presence. While the scene depicts an inhabited place, it is devoid of figures, which lends a quiet stillness to the view. The simplified forms and flattened perspective also contribute to this sense of detachment, as if the artist is presenting not a literal representation but rather an emotional response to the landscape. The color choices – the intense blues juxtaposed with the warm reds and oranges – suggest a tension between coolness and warmth, perhaps hinting at underlying complexities within the seemingly idyllic setting.