#28798 Jaime Lorente

The artwork presents a striking juxtaposition of geometric abstraction and representational imagery. A central circular motif dominates the composition, containing a monochrome drawing rendered in what appears to be charcoal or graphite. This inner circle is set against a vibrant background composed of parallel lines in varying hues – yellow, orange, green, purple, blue, and red – creating an optical effect that suggests movement and depth.
Within the circular space, we see a still life arrangement. A large, roughly drawn apple occupies a prominent position, its form somewhat distorted and ambiguous. Adjacent to it lies what seems to be a partially unwrapped loaf of bread or pastry, alongside a cluster of small rodents – likely mice – depicted with a degree of realism that contrasts sharply with the stylized rendering of the fruit. Further elements include a cylindrical object resembling a spool of thread or yarn, a blocky form that could represent a stone or piece of furniture, and what appears to be a disembodied human ear resting on a small pile of fabric.
The artist’s choice to confine this still life within a circle is significant. The circular shape evokes notions of wholeness, cyclical time, and perhaps even the cosmos. However, the fragmented nature of the objects within – their distorted forms and seemingly random arrangement – undermines any sense of harmony or completeness. This tension between containment and fragmentation suggests a commentary on perception, reality, and the limitations of representation.
The background’s dynamic linear pattern further complicates the reading of the image. The bright colors and repetitive lines create an energetic field that seems to both frame and overwhelm the still life. It could be interpreted as representing the chaotic nature of external forces or the subjective experience of reality – a visual manifestation of how our perceptions are shaped by surrounding influences.
The overall effect is one of unsettling ambiguity. The combination of meticulous drawing with a deliberately crude style, coupled with the jarring contrast between the representational and abstract elements, invites multiple interpretations. It seems to question the nature of observation, the reliability of memory, and the boundaries between the tangible world and the realm of imagination.