Neo Rauch – 2003 RAUNE0054.sm
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see three individuals positioned in the foreground, seemingly observing an event taking place below. The figure on the left is draped in a vibrant green shawl, his posture suggesting contemplation or concern. To his right stands a younger man with short hair, appearing more detached from the unfolding scene. A third individual, dressed in what appears to be a historical military uniform – specifically, red coat and tricorn hat – is positioned at the far right, leaning on a long object that resembles a weapon or tool. His stance is assertive, almost confrontational, suggesting a position of authority or potential intervention.
Below these observers, a figure lies prone on a platform, partially obscured by a ladder extending upwards into the darkness. This individual’s body is rendered with an unsettling ambiguity; their skin tone appears pale and unnatural, and they seem to be offering something – perhaps papers or small objects – towards the viewer. The gesture is ambiguous: it could signify supplication, warning, or even mockery.
The architectural setting behind the figures is equally perplexing. A stylized cityscape is visible through a large opening in what seems to be a wooden structure. This backdrop combines elements of historical and contemporary architecture, creating a sense of temporal displacement. The sky above the city is rendered with swirling patterns of blue and white, evoking both turbulence and an otherworldly quality.
The painting’s subtexts are layered and open to interpretation. The juxtaposition of modern observers with a figure seemingly trapped in a historical tableau suggests themes of memory, representation, and the burden of the past. The military figures presence introduces elements of power dynamics and potential conflict. The ambiguous gesture of the prone figure invites questions about truth, deception, and the nature of communication. The overall effect is one of unsettling surrealism, where familiar forms are distorted and recontextualized to create a sense of unease and intellectual inquiry. The deliberate use of color – the vibrant greens and reds against the muted tones of the background – further enhances this feeling of disorientation and symbolic weight.