Henri Matisse – The Moraccans, 1916 ,Moma, NY
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The left side presents a cluster of rounded shapes – predominantly green and orange – that could be interpreted as fruits or decorative objects arranged in a pile. These forms are delineated by sharp lines and angular divisions, preventing them from appearing organic or naturally cohesive. A rectilinear structure, resembling a railing or architectural detail, intersects this grouping, further dissecting the visual field.
On the right side, a more complex arrangement of figures emerges. The artist depicted what seems to be several individuals, though their features are obscured by the cubist fragmentation. Their bodies are rendered as overlapping planes and angular shapes, making it difficult to discern individual identities or actions. A prominent, triangular form in reddish-brown dominates this area, potentially representing a building facade or a stylized landscape element. A circular shape, positioned centrally within this group, draws attention and contributes to the overall sense of visual dynamism.
The color palette is restrained, dominated by earthy tones – greens, browns, oranges, and reds – punctuated by areas of white and black. The limited range of colors reinforces the painting’s formal qualities, emphasizing the interplay of shapes and planes over representational accuracy.
Subtly embedded within this fractured visual language are hints of cultural specificity. The presence of what appear to be traditional garments – a dark tunic on one figure – and the architectural details suggest a North African setting. However, these cues are not presented in a straightforward or documentary manner; instead, they are integrated into the abstract composition, contributing to an overall sense of exoticism and otherness.
The work seems less concerned with depicting a specific narrative than it is with exploring the possibilities of visual representation through fragmentation and abstraction. The disjointed forms and ambiguous space invite viewers to actively engage in reconstructing meaning from the scattered elements, creating a complex interplay between observation and interpretation.