Vasily Kandinsky – Improvisation. Gorge
1914.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
A dominant feature is the use of color. Intense yellows and oranges are juxtaposed with deep blues and purples, creating a visual tension that contributes to the overall feeling of unrestrained expression. These colors do not appear to be used representationally; instead, they function as independent elements contributing to the emotional impact of the piece. The application of paint is often thick and impastoed, adding texture and further emphasizing the physicality of the artistic process.
Within this chaotic arrangement, certain forms seem to emerge. A series of vertical lines, some sharply defined and others blurred, suggest a sense of architectural structure or perhaps the suggestion of towering natural formations. Circular shapes are scattered throughout, acting as focal points that draw the eye across the surface. These elements do not coalesce into recognizable figures or landscapes; rather, they exist in a state of perpetual flux, suggesting a world in constant transformation.
The absence of traditional perspective and depth cues contributes to the flattening effect of the composition. This lack of spatial clarity reinforces the sense of immediacy and emotional intensity that permeates the work. The viewer is not invited into a scene but confronted with an outpouring of feeling.
Subtly, one might interpret this as a visual representation of internal states – perhaps anxiety, excitement, or overwhelming sensory input. The fragmented forms could symbolize broken connections or disrupted narratives. Alternatively, it can be seen as a celebration of spontaneity and the power of pure abstraction to evoke emotion without relying on representational imagery. Ultimately, the painting resists definitive interpretation, inviting viewers to engage with its energy and complexity on their own terms.