Vasily Kandinsky – Study for Composition II
1910.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a group of individuals rendered as simplified volumes, their bodies elongated and distorted, often lacking clear definition of facial features or individual characteristics. They appear to be arranged in tiers, some standing, others reclining or kneeling, creating a sense of layered depth despite the flattened pictorial space. The figures are not spatially organized according to realistic proportions; they overlap and intersect, contributing to an overall feeling of instability and compression.
The color palette is bold and dissonant. Intense yellows, greens, reds, and blues dominate, applied in broad, unmodulated strokes that heighten the sense of emotional intensity. Theres a deliberate lack of tonal gradation, which further contributes to the painting’s flatness and its rejection of traditional modeling techniques. The colors dont seem to describe objects realistically; instead, they appear to function as expressive vehicles, conveying an atmosphere of anxiety or heightened psychological state.
The landscape elements – suggested trees, hills, and architectural forms – are similarly abstracted, reduced to geometric shapes and planes. These features are not integrated seamlessly with the figures but rather exist in a dynamic tension with them, reinforcing the sense of disorientation. A prominent cross-like shape is visible amidst the foliage, potentially introducing religious or symbolic undertones, though its meaning remains ambiguous within the context of the overall composition.
The painting’s subtexts likely revolve around themes of collective experience and psychological turmoil. The crowded arrangement of figures suggests a loss of individual identity within a larger group dynamic. The distorted forms and jarring colors evoke feelings of unease and alienation. It is possible that the work explores anxieties surrounding societal structures, religious dogma, or the fragility of human connection. The absence of a clear narrative invites multiple interpretations, allowing for a subjective engagement with the emotional landscape presented on the canvas.