Arthur William Devis – Gentleman with a Cannon
1741 oil on canvas
Location: Yale Center for British Art, Paul Mellon Collection, New Haven.
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The man’s clothing is meticulously detailed: a dark blue coat embroidered with gold accents, paired with matching breeches and stockings. A pale yellow waistcoat peeks from beneath the coat, adding a touch of elegance and highlighting his status. His posture is upright, but not stiff; theres a subtle relaxation in his stance that suggests confidence rather than rigidity. He holds a cannon diagonally across his body, its barrel resting on his shoulder. The cannon itself appears well-maintained, suggesting it’s more than just a prop – it implies involvement with military affairs or perhaps a position of civic responsibility.
The color palette is dominated by cool blues and yellows, creating a visual harmony that reinforces the sense of order and control. The contrast between the dark clothing and the lighter background emphasizes the figures presence. The artist’s use of light is strategic; it illuminates the man’s face and hands, drawing attention to his expression and the way he interacts with the cannon.
Beyond a straightforward portrait, the painting seems to explore themes of power, responsibility, and perhaps even a subtle commentary on societal roles. The presence of the cannon introduces an element of potential force or defense, suggesting that the man’s position involves more than just social standing – it carries implications for protection and authority. The landscape backdrop, while indistinct, hints at a broader context beyond the individuals immediate sphere, implying his connection to larger events or concerns. The overall impression is one of a man who embodies both refinement and readiness, suggesting a complex interplay between personal identity and public duty.