Francois Boucher – Architecture and Chemistry
1750-52. 217x77. The Frick Collection
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
In the upper panel, we observe a young boy seated at a table, seemingly engaged in architectural drafting. He wears a powdered wig and period attire, suggesting a connection to the Enlightenment era’s emphasis on reason and progress. Behind him, through an open window, stretches a landscape of idealized buildings and rolling hills – a vision of ordered urban planning and harmonious integration with nature. The boys posture is attentive; he appears absorbed in his work, hinting at intellectual pursuit and creative endeavor. Light illuminates the table and the boy’s face, emphasizing his role as the central figure of this scene.
The lower panel contrasts sharply with the upper. Here we see a similar young boy, again dressed in period clothing and wearing a wig, but now immersed in what appears to be an alchemical laboratory. Flames flicker beneath retorts and glassware, casting dramatic shadows across his face and the surrounding equipment. The atmosphere is dense with smoke and a sense of intense activity. Scattered around him are various objects – books, vials, and tools – suggesting experimentation and discovery. This scene evokes a feeling of controlled chaos, hinting at the transformative power of scientific inquiry but also acknowledging its potential dangers.
The juxtaposition of these two panels – architecture and chemistry – suggests a commentary on the relationship between design and science, order and transformation. The repeated figure of the boy implies that both disciplines require similar qualities: focused attention, intellectual curiosity, and a willingness to engage with complex systems. The contrast in setting and activity underscores the different approaches inherent in each field – one concerned with structure and form, the other with process and change.
The ornate frame itself contributes significantly to the work’s meaning. Its floral motifs symbolize growth, knowledge, and the flourishing of intellectual pursuits. The division into two distinct panels reinforces the idea that these fields are separate yet interconnected aspects of human understanding. Ultimately, the piece appears to celebrate the Enlightenment ideal of progress through both rational design and scientific exploration.