Etienne Delessert – Story Number I
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
Here we see a lion perched atop the first cylinder, its expression suggesting weariness or resignation. Adjacent to it, a bird-like figure with an elongated neck appears to be observing the scene with detached curiosity. The second cylinder hosts a fantastical hybrid creature – a combination of fish and mammal – its head tilted as if listening intently. A dragonfly rests on the third cylinder, alongside what seems to be a miniature human figure riding its back, adding a layer of playful absurdity. A butterfly is perched atop this structure too, with another tiny person seemingly nestled within its wings.
At the base of these monumental forms, diminutive figures – possibly humans – are depicted in various states of activity: one appears to be playing an instrument, while others seem to be engaged in quiet contemplation or simple tasks. A small rodent observes from a shadowed alcove, adding a sense of hidden perspective. The background is rendered as a hazy landscape with indistinct foliage and a single, large eye peering out from the right edge, further contributing to the overall feeling of unreality and mystery.
The subtexts within this painting appear to explore themes of hierarchy, observation, and the relationship between scale and power. The towering cylinders suggest an established order or system, while the creatures inhabiting them seem to represent different roles or perspectives within that structure. The diminutive figures at the base underscore a sense of insignificance in the face of larger forces. The inclusion of animals with human-like qualities blurs the boundaries between species, prompting reflection on shared characteristics and potential for understanding across perceived differences. The overall effect is one of gentle satire, inviting viewers to question conventional notions of authority and perspective while simultaneously embracing the inherent absurdity of existence.