Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin – burdock. End of 1880 37, 3h24, 7
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
гениально
You cannot comment Why?
The lower portion of the painting is characterized by a dense tangle of stems and roots, painted in earthy tones of brown, ochre, and reddish hues. This area appears darker than the leaves above, creating a sense of depth and suggesting that the plant’s root system extends into the soil below. The artists application of paint here is particularly vigorous, with thick impasto adding to the feeling of tangled growth.
The background is indistinct, rendered in muted greens and browns, which further concentrates attention on the central subject. There is a deliberate lack of clarity; it’s not possible to discern any broader landscape context. This isolation contributes to the paintings focus on the individual plant as an object of observation.
Subtly, the work seems to explore themes of resilience and persistence. The burdock, often considered a weed, is presented with a certain dignity, its robust form suggesting an ability to thrive even in challenging conditions. The rough texture and muted palette evoke a sense of naturalness and perhaps even melancholy, hinting at the cyclical nature of growth and decay. The close-up perspective invites contemplation of the minute details of the natural world, prompting consideration of beauty found within seemingly commonplace elements.