Alfred Sisley – Sisley Bridge at Villeneuve-la-Garenne, 1872, 49.5x65.4 cm,
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Сислей прекрасный художник. Работы импрессионистов выше многих работ известных традиционных живописцев своей свежестью, точной натурной передачей света и цвета, они живые, а тех иллюстративные...
You cannot comment Why?
Beyond the bridge, a cluster of buildings occupies the right side of the view. These structures are characterized by their modest scale and simple architectural forms – predominantly white facades with dark green shutters and pitched roofs. They appear to be residential dwellings, perhaps interspersed with small commercial establishments. The artist has captured them in sunlight, creating highlights that contrast with the shadows cast on their walls.
The water surface occupies a significant portion of the lower half of the painting. It is depicted with shimmering reflections of the bridge, buildings, and sky, achieved through short, broken brushstrokes of varying greens, blues, and yellows. Several small boats are scattered across the water’s surface, adding a sense of human presence without disrupting the overall serenity.
Above, the sky is filled with billowing clouds rendered in soft whites and pale blues. The cloud formations contribute to the paintings atmospheric quality, suggesting a breezy day. The light appears diffused, bathing the scene in a gentle glow.
The artist’s technique emphasizes observation of natural phenomena – the play of light on water, the texture of foliage, the subtle gradations of color in the sky. There is an absence of dramatic narrative or overt symbolism; instead, the work seems to celebrate the quiet beauty of an everyday landscape. The scene evokes a sense of stillness and contemplation, inviting the viewer to share in the artist’s appreciation for the simple pleasures of nature and rural life.
The compositions balance between man-made structures (the bridge and buildings) and natural elements (water, sky, vegetation) suggests a harmonious coexistence. It is not a depiction of industrial progress or urban sprawl, but rather a glimpse into a more pastoral setting where human activity blends seamlessly with the environment.