Boris Grigoriev – Faces Of Russia
1923. 50.5х56.5
Location: Private Collection
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
ХУДОЖНИК ГРИГОРЬЕВ
Острохарактерны лица,
жёстко выявлена суть.
Будущая заграницы
жизни продиктует путь.
Сложно сделаны потреты,
плюс – иконописный цвет.
Коли свет даёт сюжеты -
изучать пристало свет.
You cannot comment Why?
Dominating the central space is the portrait of an older man, his face deeply etched with lines that speak of experience and hardship. The artist has emphasized the texture of his skin through a visible brushstroke technique, lending him a palpable presence. A dark cap obscures part of his forehead, casting shadows that accentuate the prominence of his nose and beard. His expression is ambiguous; it could be interpreted as weary resignation or perhaps a guarded intelligence.
To the right, partially obscured by the older man’s profile, appears a smaller figure – a child seemingly dressed in elaborate folk attire. The childs pose suggests playfulness or curiosity, yet their placement within the composition feels somewhat detached from the more solemn expressions of the other figures.
The background is rendered in broad planes of color – yellows and oranges that evoke a sense of warmth but also potentially suggest an oppressive atmosphere. Abstracted shapes resembling architectural elements or landscape features are visible through these colors, further contributing to the painting’s dreamlike quality. The overall effect is one of symbolic representation rather than realistic depiction.
Subtly, the arrangement of figures suggests a generational narrative – the young woman representing the future, the older man embodying the past, and the child symbolizing hope or continuity. However, the lack of interaction between these individuals creates a sense of isolation, hinting at underlying tensions or perhaps the complexities inherent in defining a collective identity. The painting seems to be less about portraying specific people and more about conveying an emotional landscape – a portrait of a nation grappling with its history and future.