Part 5 Louvre – Jan Cossiers -- Ecce homo (Christ presented before Pilate)
c.1620, 73х54
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Jan COSSIERS 1600-1671 – Ecce Homo ou Pilate présentant le Christ au peuple – Louvre RF 1994-20 [Tableau sans doute peint à Anvers vers 1620, avant les séjours de l’artiste en 1623 – 1626 à Aix-en-Provence et à Rome.
Acquis à Paris sur le marché de l’art (Bob Haboldt), 1994]
You cannot comment Why?
The figure being carried exhibits clear signs of torment. A crown of thorns presses into his brow, drawing blood which trickles down his face. His torso is bare, revealing wounds that appear fresh and actively bleeding. He grasps a thin staff or rod for support, suggesting exhaustion and weakness. The man’s gaze is directed downwards, conveying a sense of resignation or perhaps inward contemplation amidst the pain.
The supporting figure, presumably an authority figure given his elaborate headwear – a turban-like headdress adorned with a jeweled clasp – appears stern and impassive. His beard is long and white, lending him an air of age and gravitas. He looks directly out at the viewer, creating a direct connection that implicates the observer in the unfolding drama. The gesture of his hand, partially obscuring the face of the man he carries, could be interpreted as both control and protection, adding complexity to his role.
The artist’s use of chiaroscuro – the stark contrast between light and dark – is crucial to the paintings impact. It not only draws attention to the figures but also creates a palpable atmosphere of tension and solemnity. The darkness surrounding them suggests isolation and perhaps impending doom.
Subtly, the composition explores themes of power, suffering, and responsibility. The authority figure’s detached gaze raises questions about culpability and judgment. The vulnerability of the man being carried evokes empathy and invites reflection on sacrifice and endurance. The overall effect is one of profound emotional weight, prompting consideration of the human condition in the face of adversity and injustice.