Part 5 Louvre – Alessandro Magnasco -- Christ Heals the Paralytic
c.1735, 35х44
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Думаю скачать это изображение
You cannot comment Why?
At the center, a figure with long hair and draped in blue robes raises an arm in a gesture that seems both authoritative and compassionate. He is surrounded by a throng of individuals exhibiting a range of emotional responses: supplication, awe, skepticism, and even hostility. A man lying on a makeshift stretcher or pallet is positioned prominently near the central figure, seemingly the recipient of attention. The artist has rendered him with considerable detail, emphasizing his muscular physique despite his apparent infirmity.
The color palette is dominated by earthy tones – ochres, browns, and siennas – which contribute to a sense of somberness and antiquity. However, splashes of blue in the central figure’s robes and hints of green within the architectural backdrop provide visual contrast and draw the eye toward the focal point. The use of light is dramatic; it illuminates certain figures while leaving others shrouded in darkness, enhancing the emotional intensity of the moment.
The arrangement of bodies is complex and layered. Figures overlap and intertwine, creating a sense of immediacy and crowding. Some individuals are depicted with exaggerated expressions and gestures, contributing to the overall dynamism of the scene. The inclusion of Roman soldiers or guards – recognizable by their helmets and armor – adds another layer of complexity, suggesting potential conflict or resistance to the central figure’s actions.
Beyond the literal depiction of a healing event, the painting seems to explore themes of faith, doubt, power, and social unrest. The mixture of reverence and antagonism within the crowd suggests a society grappling with profound questions about authority and belief. The architectural setting, grand yet somewhat dilapidated, hints at the decline of an empire or institution, perhaps serving as a visual metaphor for the transformative nature of the central figure’s presence. The artists choice to depict such a large group of people also implies that this event has significant social implications beyond the immediate individuals involved.