Mysterious ancient artifacts:
truth or fake? Automatic translate

The world of archaeology is full of amazing finds that spark heated debates in the scientific community. From strange mechanical devices to mysterious writings, some artifacts are so unusual that they challenge our understanding of the technological capabilities of ancient civilizations. Some researchers consider them to be genuine evidence of highly advanced ancient cultures, while others see them as clever forgeries or the result of misinterpretations. Modern research methods are helping to reveal the truth, but many artifacts remain at the center of scientific debate.

Technological artifacts

Antikythera mechanism

The Antikythera Mechanism is one of the most amazing technological devices of the ancient world. Discovered in 1901 in the wreckage of a sunken ship off the Greek island of Antikythera, the mechanism dates back to approximately 150-100 BC and is the oldest known analog computing device.

The artifact consists of bronze gears placed in a wooden case measuring approximately 34 cm × 18 cm × 9 cm. The mechanism was originally found as a single piece, which was later divided into three main fragments, which, in turn, were divided into 82 individual fragments after restoration work. The largest gear has a diameter of about 13 cm and originally contained 223 teeth.

Research has shown that the device could predict the positions of celestial bodies, eclipses, and track a four-year cycle of sporting events like the Olympic Games. Experts note that some of the mechanism’s readings were inaccurate - for example, the Mars indicator could be off by up to 38 degrees at certain points in its orbit. These inaccuracies are not due to design flaws, but to limitations of ancient Greek astronomical theory.

Professor Michael Edmunds, from Cardiff University, who led the research into the mechanism, said: “This is an extraordinary device, one of a kind. The design is superb, the astronomical calculations are precise. The mechanical design is simply astonishing. Whoever made it did it with the utmost care.”

The Antikythera Mechanism demonstrates a level of technological mastery that did not appear in Europe until the 14th century AD, making it a unique testimony to the scientific achievements of ancient Greek civilization.

Baghdad Battery

The Baghdad Battery is the name given to a set of artefacts discovered in 1936 near the city of Ctesiphon in modern-day Iraq. The set consists of a clay vessel about 14 cm high, a copper cylinder, and an iron rod. The artefact dates back to the Parthian (150 BC – 223 AD) or Sassanid (224 – 650 AD) period.

Wilhelm Koenig, former director of the National Museum of Iraq, suggested that these objects may have functioned as a primitive galvanic cell. According to his hypothesis, if the vessel was filled with an acidic liquid, such as grape juice or vinegar, the result was a device capable of producing a weak electric current. Koenig believed that such batteries could have been used to electrochemically deposit thin layers of metal or for medical purposes.

However, most archaeologists are skeptical of this interpretation. Critics point out the lack of conductive wires or other components needed to harness electricity, as well as the fact that no electrodeposited objects from the relevant period have been found. An alternative and more common theory is that the vessels may have been used to store sacred scrolls.

Unfortunately, the original artifact was lost during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, making further research difficult. While modern reconstructions show that such a device could theoretically generate a weak electrical current, the lack of archaeological context to indicate the practical use of electricity in the ancient world leaves the question of the purpose of the Baghdad Battery open.

Dendera lamp

The Temple of the Goddess Hathor in Dendera, Egypt, contains mysterious reliefs known as the Dendera Lamp. These images, located in the crypts of the temple, have caused much debate regarding their interpretation.

The reliefs depict a serpent emerging from a lotus and enclosed in an oval shape supported by a djed pillar. According to the hieroglyphic texts surrounding the images, they represent statues associated with the Egyptian creation myth. In particular, they depict Harsomtus, sometimes identified with the god Ra, in the form of a serpent emerging from a lotus flower.

In the 1980s, an alternative interpretation of these reliefs emerged, proposed by proponents of theories about ancient advanced technology. They claimed that the oval shape resembles an incandescent light bulb, the snake may represent a thread, and the djed column may represent an insulated handle. This hypothesis suggests that the ancient Egyptians may have had knowledge of electricity.

However, Egyptologists emphasize that such an interpretation ignores the cultural and religious context of the images. The cryptographic text accompanying the reliefs clearly describes them as part of religious symbolism. The cryptographic temple was considered an analogue of the underworld Duat, and the reliefs depicted cult statues that were stored underground as the "bodies" of the gods until they were reborn through contact with the light on the roof of the temple.

The traditional Egyptological explanation of the reliefs is firmly supported by knowledge of Egyptian religious symbolism and language, while the "technological" interpretation is based on superficial visual similarities without regard for the cultural context.

Mysterious manuscripts and cartographic materials

The Voynich Manuscript

The Voynich manuscript, named after Wilfried Voynich, who acquired it in the early 20th century, is a mysterious manuscript written in an unknown alphabet and language. The codex consists of approximately 240 pages of parchment with many illustrations of plants, astronomical objects, and nude female figures.

Radiocarbon dating by University of Arizona researchers in 2009 determined that the parchment was made between 1404 and 1438. Stylistic analysis points to a possible Italian Renaissance origin for the manuscript.

The manuscript text has unusual characteristics - it lacks visible errors and corrections, which is unusual for natural manuscripts of the time. The distribution of words and symbols shows statistical patterns similar to natural languages, but does not correspond to any known historical language or cipher.

The manuscript’s contents are usually divided into six main sections: herbal, astronomical, biological, cosmological, pharmaceutical, and recipes. The herbal takes up most of the book and contains images of unidentified plants with accompanying text. The astronomical section includes circular diagrams with symbols of constellations and zodiac signs. The biological section depicts naked female figures bathing in strange liquids connected by pipes.

Over the centuries of the manuscript’s existence, many theories have been proposed about its origins and purpose, ranging from a genuine scientific or medical text to an elaborate forgery or a coded heretical treatise. Some researchers suggest that it may be an example of an artificial language or the result of glossolalia (automatic writing).

Despite numerous attempts to decipher it using both traditional linguistic methods and modern computer algorithms, the text of the Voynich manuscript remains undeciphered, continuing to intrigue scientists and enthusiasts with its mystery.

Piri Reis Map

The Piri Reis Map is a fragment of a world map compiled in 1513 by the Ottoman admiral and cartographer Piri Reis. Only about a third of the original map survives today and is now housed in the Topkapi Palace in Istanbul. After the conquest of Egypt in 1517, Piri Reis presented the map to the Ottoman Sultan Selim I, after which it disappeared from historical records until its rediscovery in 1929.

What makes the map especially valuable is that it contains a partial copy of a now lost map by Christopher Columbus. Unlike European maps of the time, it is made in the style of a portolan with compass roses and a grid of points for navigation instead of lines of latitude and longitude. The map contains extensive notes in Ottoman Turkish.

The map’s depiction of South America is highly accurate for its time. However, the northwest coast is a mixture of Central American and Cuban elements combined into a single landmass. Scientists attribute this to the influence of Columbus’s mistaken belief that he had reached Asia. The southern Atlantic coast presumably depicts the hypothetical Terra Australis.

The map has generated many controversial interpretations. Some enthusiasts claim that it depicts Antarctica without ice cover, although the continent was officially discovered only in 1820. They suggest that the map could have been copied from older sources created by an unknown advanced civilization. However, professional cartographers and historians explain these features by the assumptions of the time about the existence of a southern continent and creative interpretation of the available data.

The Piri Reis map is visually distinct from European portolans, and was influenced by the Islamic tradition of miniatures. It was unusual in the Islamic cartographic tradition in that it included many non-Muslim sources, reflecting the cultural exchange between the Islamic and Christian worlds during the Age of Discovery.

Phaistos Disc

The Phaistos Disc is a unique archaeological artifact discovered in 1908 by the Italian archaeologist Luigi Pernier during excavations of the Minoan palace in Phaistos on the island of Crete. The disc is a round clay tablet about 16 cm in diameter and almost 2 cm thick, covered on both sides with a spiral row of symbols.

The disk is unique in that its 241 characters, organized into 61 groups, were impressed onto soft clay by pressing individual stamps before firing. This makes it the oldest known example of the use of a unique "printing" technology with movable characters, thousands of years before Gutenberg invented printing.

The dating of the disc remains a matter of debate. Different researchers assign it to the period between 1850 and 1600 BC (Middle Minoan period) or to a later time (1400-1300 BC, Late Minoan period). These discrepancies are due to the ambiguity of the archaeological context of the find.

The purpose and contents of the disc also remain a mystery. Various suggestions have been made – from a religious text, prayer or spell to an administrative document, calendar or even a game board. Some researchers doubted the authenticity of the disc, but modern analysis of the material and manufacturing technology confirms its ancient origin.

Numerous attempts to decipher the symbols of the Phaistos Disc have not led to generally accepted results. Most researchers believe that the signs represent a syllabic script, although hypotheses have been put forward about the alphabetic or logographic nature of the writing. The difficulty of deciphering is aggravated by the small volume of text (only about 241 signs) and the lack of reliable parallels in other known Bronze Age writing systems.

The Phaistos Disc remains one of the most mysterious artifacts of antiquity, continuing to attract the attention of both professional scientists and lovers of ancient mysteries with its unusual manufacturing technology and undeciphered message.

Bath Creek Rock

The Bath Creek Stone is a small stone tablet with a cryptic inscription discovered by John W. Emmert on February 14, 1889, while excavating the Tipton Mound in Loudoun County, Tennessee. The discovery was part of a larger archaeological survey led by Cyrus Thomas to determine who created the numerous mounds in the eastern United States.

The stone measures 11.4 centimeters in length and 5.1 centimeters in width. It is engraved with eight symbols, seven of which are located in one line, and the eighth is under the main inscription. The depth of the engraving of the symbols is approximately 2-3 millimeters.

In the late 19th century, when the stone was found, Cyrus Thomas interpreted the inscription as letters from the Cherokee alphabet. This version was long considered the accepted version until about a century later, when the scholar Cyrus H. Gordon proposed an alternative theory. He suggested that the symbols represent paleo-Hebrew from the first or second century CE, which could indicate contacts between the ancient Near East and the Americas before Columbus.

Gordon’s hypothesis has caused considerable debate in the scientific community. Archaeologists Robert Mainforth and Mary Kwas conducted a detailed study of the stone and concluded that it was likely a 19th-century forgery. They found that the symbols on the stone could have been copied from popular period publications containing samples of ancient alphabets.

According to their analysis, the forgery may have been created to support a popular theory at the time that the mound builders were descended from the “lost tribes of Israel.” This was in keeping with religious and cultural trends in the 19th century, when many Americans were interested in biblical archaeology and looking for connections between Native Americans and the ancient Israelites.

While the true origins of the Bath Creek Stone remain a matter of debate, most modern archaeologists agree that it is unreliable as a historical artifact. However, it is interesting as an example of how archaeological finds can be interpreted through the lens of the cultural and religious beliefs of their time.

Unusual 3D artifacts

Crystal Skulls

Crystal skulls are rock crystal carvings in the shape of human skulls that have long been considered pre-Columbian Mesoamerican artifacts. The best-known examples are housed in the British Museum in London, the Musée de l’Orsay in Paris, and private collections. The most famous is the so-called "Mitchell-Hedges skull," allegedly discovered in 1924 in the ancient Mayan city of Lubaantun in British Honduras (now Belize).

The Mitchell-Hedges skull is made from a single piece of clear quartz, about the size of a small human skull – about 13 cm high, 18 cm long and 13 cm wide. The lower jaw is separated from the main part. Many legends have arisen around this artifact – it has been claimed that it has paranormal properties, is up to 12,000 years old and was created using technologies unavailable to ancient civilizations.

In the early 1970s, the skull was examined by restorer Frank Dorland, who stated that the artifact had been carved with complete disregard for the natural crystalline axis of the quartz, which is impossible with metal tools. The skull was later studied at Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, where it was determined that it was made from a single quartz crystal, including a separate lower jaw.

However, modern scientific research has disproved the claims of ancient origin of the crystal skulls. In 2007-2008, Jane Maclaurin Walsh of the Smithsonian Institution conducted a detailed analysis of the Mitchell-Hedges skull using ultraviolet light, a high-powered optical microscope, and CT scanning. The scanning electron microscope revealed evidence of high-speed rotary tools with hard abrasives such as diamond, a technology unavailable to pre-Columbian civilizations.

Studies of all known crystal skulls at the British Museum and elsewhere have shown that they were made in Europe, most likely in the workshops of Idar-Oberstein, a German town famous in the 19th century for its processing of quartz from Brazil. The Mitchell-Hedges skull was probably made in the 1930s, modeled on the British Museum skull.

Contrary to popular belief, authentic Mesoamerican myths and religious texts do not contain references to crystal skulls with mystical properties. These legends arose much later, in the context of the esoteric and New Age movements of the 20th century, and were popularized in fiction and cinema.

Bird of Saqqara

The Saqqara Bird is a wooden model of a bird made from sycamore wood and mounted on a stick, discovered during the excavation of the tomb of Pa-di-Imena in Saqqara, Egypt, in 1898. The artifact dates back to approximately 200 BC and is currently housed in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo. The model has a wingspan of 18 cm and weighs approximately 39 grams.

The purpose of this artifact remains a subject of debate among archaeologists. The most likely hypothesis is that the Saqqara Bird had religious or ceremonial significance. The model is made in the form of a falcon, a bird that was often used to depict important Egyptian deities such as Horus and Ra Horakhty. It is suggested that it may have been placed on the mast of sacred boats used during the religious festival of Opet. Reliefs depicting such boats were found in the Temple of Khonsu in Karnak and date back to the late New Kingdom.

Other possible explanations include use as a children’s toy for the elite or as a simple weather vane.

In the late 20th century, an alternative and much more controversial interpretation of the Saqqara Bird emerged. Some researchers, including Egyptian physician Khalil Messiha, suggested that the artifact might be a model of an ancient flying machine. Supporters of this theory point to the aerodynamic shape of the model and have experimented with copies, claiming that with the addition of a tail stabilizer, it is capable of gliding.

However, professional archaeologists and aviation historians reject this interpretation. Richard P. Hallion notes that the original model is “too heavy and unstable to fly on its own.” Critics also point out that the gliding properties exhibited by modified replicas made from lightweight modern materials and with added stabilizers do not prove that the original artifact was designed to fly.

The absence of any references to flying machines or images of flying people in Egyptian hieroglyphic texts, in the presence of detailed records of everyday life and technology, also argues against the "aviation" hypothesis. The traditional interpretation of the Saqqara Bird as a religious artifact remains the most reasonable in terms of the historical and cultural context of ancient Egypt.

Roman Dodecahedron

Roman dodecahedrons are unusual metal objects with a regular twelve-sided shape, found in the territory of the former Roman Empire. In total, more than one hundred such objects have been discovered, mostly in the territories of modern France and Germany, although individual examples have also been found in Hungary and the United Kingdom.

These artifacts are made of bronze or stone and date back to the 2nd-3rd centuries AD. The dodecahedrons range in size from 4 to 11 centimeters. Each dodecahedron has 12 flat pentagonal faces with holes of different diameters in the center of each face. The vertices are often decorated with spherical protrusions.

What makes these objects particularly mysterious is the complete absence of any mention of them in Roman texts or depictions in frescoes and mosaics of the time. None of the artifacts found have inscriptions that could shed light on their purpose.

Over the years, many hypotheses have been put forward about the possible uses of Roman dodecahedrons. Among the most popular versions are their use as candlesticks (wax was found inside one specimen), dice, measuring devices for determining distances, or gauges for checking the size of coins or pipelines.

Some researchers suggest that dodecahedrons could have been used as astronomical instruments to determine the optimal dates for agricultural work, such as sowing winter crops. Others believe that they could have served as bases for military standards or been used in religious rituals. The latter version is supported by the fact that most of the finds were made in Gallo-Roman areas, where local Celtic cults were preserved.

Despite the hypotheses put forward, the exact purpose of the Roman dodecahedrons remains unknown, making them one of the most intriguing archaeological mysteries of the Roman era. The lack of written records is especially surprising for a civilization that left detailed descriptions of most aspects of its culture and technology.

Famous hoaxes and fakes

Piltdown Man

Piltdown Man is one of the most famous scientific hoaxes of the 20th century, confounding anthropologists and historians of human evolution for decades. The story began in 1912, when amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson claimed to have discovered skull and jaw fragments of a previously unknown human ancestor in a gravel pit near the village of Piltdown in East Sussex, England.

Dawson presented his findings to Arthur Smith Woodward, the Keeper of Geology at the British Museum of Natural History. Together, they carried out further excavations at the site and allegedly found additional skull fragments, teeth, and primitive tools. From these findings, a model of the skull of the creature was reconstructed, which was given the scientific name Eoanthropus dawsoni (Dawson’s Dawn Man).

Piltdown Man was distinguished by its combination of a large, modern-shaped braincase with a primitive, ape-like jaw. This was consistent with the popular idea of ​​the time that in human evolution the brain had grown larger before the jaws and teeth had changed. The find also flattered British national pride, since it suggested that one of the earliest human ancestors had lived on the British Isles.

Although some scientists initially questioned the authenticity of the find, Piltdown Man was widely accepted by the scientific community. It was not until 1953, more than 40 years later, that a group of researchers finally proved that the skull was a fake. Analysis showed that the “artifact” was made up of fragments of a modern human skull no more than a few hundred years old and a modified orangutan jaw. The teeth had been artificially filed to simulate human wear, and all the fragments had been painted to make them look ancient.

A major scientific investigation in 2016 established that the primary, if not sole, creator of the forgery was Charles Dawson himself. The analysis showed that all the items associated with Piltdown Man were forged using the same set of materials that could have been found in Dawson’s possession.

The Piltdown hoax had a significant negative impact on paleoanthropology, delaying the recognition of genuine human ancestors in Africa for decades. At the same time, its exposure led to a significant increase in the standards for testing and authenticating paleontological finds, promoting the development of more rigorous scientific methods.

Cardiff Giant

The Cardiff Giant is one of the most famous archaeological hoaxes in American history, which caused a sensation in 1869. The story began when workers digging a well on the farm of William "Stub" Newell near Cardiff, New York, unearthed what appeared to be a petrified human body more than ten feet tall.

News of the discovery spread quickly, and thousands of people flocked to see the “stone giant.” Newell, not missing out on the opportunity to make money, set up a tent over the dig site and began charging 50 cents (a significant sum at the time) to view it. Visitors were treated to a glimpse of the enormous figure of a man lying on his back, with his knees drawn up to his chest and an expression of agony on his face.

Many took the find for a genuine fossilized remains of an ancient giant, which would correspond to some religious beliefs about the existence of giants in the past, mentioned in the Bible. Some scientists, however, immediately expressed skepticism. Paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh of Yale University, having examined the find, declared: “This is a very crude fake.”

The truth soon came out. The Cardiff Giant was created by New York tobacco merchant George Hull, who conceived the hoax after arguing with a Methodist preacher about the literal interpretation of the Bible verse in Genesis (6:4) that mentions giants. Hull, an atheist and skeptic, was determined to prove how easy it was to deceive those who blindly believed in the authority of scripture.

In 1868, Hull had a one-ton block of gypsum brought from a quarry in Fort Dodge, Iowa, shipped to Chicago. There, he hired a sculptor to create a figure of the giant. The statue was then artificially aged using acid and various weathering tools before being secretly buried on the farm of Newell, Hull’s cousin and accomplice in the hoax.

Despite the exposure, public interest in the giant did not wane. The famous showman P.T. Barnum offered $60,000 for it, but was refused. Barnum then created his own replica and exhibited it, claiming that his giant was the real thing and the original was a fake. This led to the famous phrase "there’s a new sucker born every minute" (originally attributed to Barnum as "a new circus goer born every minute").

The Cardiff Giant became a symbol of the American penchant for sensationalism and mystification during an era of rapid industrialization and scientific discovery. It also illustrated the complex relationship between science, religion, and commerce in American society at the time.

Ica Stones

The Ica Stones are a collection of engraved stones said to have been found in Peru. These andesite stones have attracted widespread attention for their depictions of dinosaurs and complex medical procedures, which, if authentic, would contradict modern scientific beliefs that humans and dinosaurs lived in different eras, separated by millions of years.

The popularizer of these artifacts was Peruvian doctor Javier Cabrera Darquea, who began collecting the stones in the 1960s. According to him, the collection numbered more than 15,000 pieces. Cabrera claimed that the stones were created by an ancient civilization with advanced knowledge in medicine, astronomy and paleontology.

In an attempt to establish the authenticity of his collection, Cabrera commissioned a series of studies. In 1967, geologist Eric Wolff examined several of the stones and claimed that the patina and wear marks on them indicated that they were ancient. However, the results of these studies were not published in recognized scientific journals and were not widely accepted by the scientific community.

The decisive evidence against the authenticity of the Ica stones was the confession of a local farmer, Basilio Uchuya, who in 1973 said that he and his wife had created the stones by copying images from magazines, books, and museum exhibits, then artificially aged them by burying them in chicken manure with added sand. Uchuya sold the stones to tourists and collectors, including Cabrera.

Despite this admission, Cabrera and his followers continued to insist on the authenticity of the collection, arguing that Uchuya had lied under pressure from authorities concerned about the illegal trade in artifacts. They pointed to the precision of the anatomical details of some dinosaurs on the rocks, which they believed could not have been reproduced by an uneducated farmer.

However, the scientific community remains skeptical. The lack of controlled archaeological excavations to confirm the origin of the stones and anachronisms in the images (such as dinosaur features that only became known in the 20th century through paleontological discoveries) argue against their authenticity. In addition, many of the images of fantastical creatures and scenes reflect modern ideas about ancient civilizations rather than real historical knowledge.

Currently, most archaeologists and historians consider the Ica stones to be modern fakes created for the tourist market and collectors interested in the paranormal and alternative theories of history.

Drop Stones

The story of the Dropa stones is one of the most famous hoaxes in the field of ufology and alternative archeology - about an extraterrestrial race of humanoids who allegedly landed on Earth about 12 thousand years ago in the area of ​​the Bayan-Khara-Ula mountains on the border of China and Tibet. According to legend, in 1938, a Chinese expedition led by archaeologist Chi Pu Tei discovered 716 graves in caves with the remains of small creatures (about 1.38 m) with large heads and thin bodies, as well as 716 stone disks about 30 cm in diameter with a hole in the center and spiral grooves containing microscopic hieroglyphs. These disks allegedly told about the crash of the Dropa race’s spaceship, their attempts to survive and interaction with local residents.

However, the story is considered fiction because:

• There is no physical evidence of the existence of the discs, skeletons or the expedition.
• The names of scholars such as Chi Pu Tei and Tsum Um Nui (who supposedly deciphered the hieroglyphs) do not correspond to Chinese onomastics and are not mentioned in reliable sources.
• Photographs of the discs taken by Austrian engineer Ernst Wegerer in 1974 have not been confirmed, and the artifacts themselves have allegedly disappeared.
• Similar Bi jade discs from the Liangzhu culture (3400 – 2250 BC) are known in China, but are not associated with extraterrestrial theories.

The story gained popularity in the 1960s after publications in the Soviet magazine Sputnik and Western publications, acquiring details, but the scientific community considers it a pseudo-archaeological hoax.