Perception of advertising by people with different levels of education
Automatic translate
Advertising impacts people differently depending on their educational status. Consumers with higher education demonstrate greater cognitive abilities when analyzing advertising messages, which influences their perception, evaluation, and response to marketing stimuli. Differences in educational level shape different information processing patterns, levels of skepticism, and the ability to recognize manipulative techniques.
2 Educational level and media literacy
3 Skepticism as a function of education
4 Socioeconomic factors and advertising perception
5 Age and developmental differences
6 Neuropsychological aspects of perception
7 Types of Advertising and Educational Differences
8 Practical implications for the advertising industry
9 Intercultural differences in perception
10 Methodological approaches to research
Cognitive mechanisms for processing advertising information
The role of working memory and attention
Educational experience shapes working memory capacity, which is directly related to the processing of visual metaphors in advertising. People with better visual working memory verbalize the content of advertising messages more quickly and recognize complex visual constructs more effectively. Advertising transmits information to cognitive and affective systems through visual processes, which control the volume and quality of data for further mental processing.
Attention is a key factor in the effectiveness of advertising. Electroencephalographic studies show theta synchronization and alpha desynchronization during advertising viewing, indicating attentional activation with episodic memory encoding. Educated consumers demonstrate more selective attention, focusing on the informational elements of advertising rather than solely on emotional stimuli.
Processing complex cognitive constructs
Advertising with indirect or ironic messages requires higher cognitive abilities for accurate interpretation. A study of students found that media-literate participants correctly interpreted cognitively complex advertising 25-29% of the time, while the control group did so only 4-13%. This demonstrates a direct link between educational background and the ability to decode multilayered advertising messages.
Visual metaphors in advertising create additional cognitive load. Neurophysiological experiments have revealed a positive relationship between cognitive load and the conceptual complexity of advertising metaphors. However, comprehension does not always mediate this relationship, suggesting automatic information processing processes dependent on the individual’s cognitive resources.
Memory and memorization of advertising messages
The hippocampus is responsible for generating and processing memories associated with advertising. Educational level influences which advertising information is retained in long-term memory. Children exposed to intense advertising remember brand names and slogans more effectively than educational content. Adults with higher education show the opposite trend — they better remember factual information about a product.
Emotional elements in advertising activate different areas of the brain depending on the viewer’s educational background. Neuroimaging studies involving 113 people from two countries showed that emotions act as early predictors of attitudes toward advertising, manifesting themselves within the first three seconds of viewing. Social cognition demonstrates peak predictive power at later stages of perception.
Educational level and media literacy
The concept of advertising literacy
Advertising literacy is an aspect of media literacy that develops the ability to critically evaluate advertising messages. It includes understanding commercial intent, recognizing persuasive tactics, and identifying the target audience. Media literacy programs enhance students’ decoding and interpretive abilities, regardless of their socioeconomic background.
The conceptual dimension of advertising literacy is especially relevant for adolescents over 12 years old. At this age, it’s crucial to develop an understanding of sales intent, persuasive strategies, and other complex aspects of advertising. Research shows that educational interventions successfully improve advertising knowledge and the ability to evaluate arguments.
Critical Thinking and Media Content Analysis
Media literacy utilizes critical thinking skills to analyze issues, identify biases, and formulate well-founded arguments. University students demonstrate varying degrees of engagement in critical thinking when evaluating media content. A significant portion of students actively analyze context and identify relationships between different sources of information, but a certain segment remains neutral or less engaged.
The ability to extract the most relevant information correlates with media literacy. Most respondents in the study demonstrated high skill and confidence in identifying key data, reflecting strong media literacy skills or familiarity with information analysis. Relatively few participants (12.2%) considered themselves less skilled, likely due to a lack of training or practice.
The influence of education on the ability to recognize manipulation
Educational background significantly influences the recognition of surrogate advertising. A cross-sectional study of 300 respondents aged 20-25 in India revealed a high level of awareness of surrogate advertising strategies, particularly for alcohol brands. Educational factors and frequent use of social media were associated with higher recognition of surrogate advertising.
Ethical concerns about surrogate tactics had a minimal impact on brand perception among participants. This indicates a gap in critical awareness of indirect advertising strategies. The results highlight the need for media literacy initiatives and regulatory measures for young people.
Skepticism as a function of education
Theory of Mind and Advertising Skepticism
Theory of mind — the ability to understand the mental states of others — influences skepticism toward advertising. People with a strong theory of mind exhibit increased skepticism and decreased attitudes, purchase intentions, and willingness to pay for the advertised product. This pattern is evident across different types of advertising.
Advertising message transparency moderates the influence of theory of mind on skepticism. An experiment with 200 adults showed that high transparency with price information on one page elicited minimal skepticism. Delayed presentation of information on a second page significantly increased skepticism and decreased attitudes, purchase intentions, and willingness to pay.
Education and development of skepticism
Education level correlates with perception of subliminal advertising. Analysis of demographic variables revealed statistically significant links between respondents’ perception of subliminal advertising and their educational level. These links were also found between age, education, and bank loyalty.
Consumers with higher education are more skeptical of misleading advertising. Research has shown that these consumers are more likely to recognize symbolic metaphors and attribute meaningful meanings to their consumer experiences. Skepticism is formed through an understanding of illegal, false, and misleading advertising.
Emotional vs. Informational Advertising
Consumers with high skepticism are more responsive to emotionally appealing advertising than to informational advertising. This contradicts the intuitive assumption that skeptical consumers prefer factual information. Emotional appeals create a connection with consumers and motivate them to engage with the advertised products or brands.
Cognitive reflection influences advertising effectiveness depending on its type. Emotional advertising leads to higher advertising attitudes and purchase intentions than rational advertising. Contrary to expectations, higher scores on the cognitive reflection test are associated with lower advertising attitude ratings for emotional ads among people with a low need for cognition.
Socioeconomic factors and advertising perception
Socioeconomic status and consumer behavior
Socioeconomic status (SES) has a strong influence on consumer behavior and attitudes. Research has shown a moderately strong relationship between consumer attitudes and behavior, and an analysis of the literature and data confirms a strong link between SES and consumer behavior. The advertising industry should explore ways to develop a brand image that appeals to the values of both low- and high-SES groups.
High-SES consumers are more willing to pay a premium for their favorite brands than low-SES consumers. The high-SES group rates the influence of brand advertising messages higher (M = 4.05, SD = 0.64) than the low-SES group (M = 3.71, SD = 0.77). This indicates that high-SES consumers are more influenced by brand advertising messages.
Education as a predictor of consumer spending
Educational attainment is a more reliable predictor of consumer spending than income alone. A regression model including education yielded an improved R² of 0.44, explaining 44% of the variability in spending. This is a significant increase from the 22% explained using income alone.
The education coefficient was statistically significant (p < 0.001) and larger than the income coefficient. This indicates that educational level makes a stronger contribution to predicting spending, even when controlling for income. The results highlight the role of education as a key determinant of consumer behavior.
Financial literacy and decision making
Education influences intertemporal consumer decisions: more educated people exhibit a stronger tendency toward future-oriented savings and spending. Educational influences enhance financial literacy and long-term planning. These factors are not captured by income metrics, but they significantly influence perceptions and responses to advertising.
Education promotes awareness, budgeting habits, lifestyle choices, and access to credit. High school graduates demonstrated the lowest spending levels, supporting the hypothesis that education positively influences spending levels. This may be due to greater purchasing power, awareness of lifestyle options, or access to financial products.
Age and developmental differences
Children’s perception of advertising
Children may not understand advertising intent due to their developing cognitive abilities. A systematic review and meta-analysis found that young people’s attitudes are influenced by advertising regardless of their level of comprehension. Higher comprehension did not protect against advertising’s influence on brand or product attitudes.
Exposure to advertising impacts several cognitive skills in children, including attention, memory, and critical thinking. Children exposed to advertising exhibit a reduced attention span due to the fast pace and repetitive nature of advertising. This leads to difficulty concentrating on tasks.
Adolescence and advertising literacy
Advertising literacy programs are especially relevant for children under 12, but older age groups are often ignored. From this age onward, more work is needed on the conceptual dimension of advertising literacy. Teenagers aged 14 and 15 with media literacy demonstrated higher decoding and interpretation skills than those without such training.
Advertising literacy is closely linked to the maturity of individuals and their experience as consumers and recipients. Developing and implementing educational programs with advertising helps develop creative and critical thinking. Students become more receptive to advertising manipulation, becoming consumers of the future.
Differences in advertising effectiveness between age groups
The study examined differences in cognitive assessments of advertising effectiveness across age groups. The primary measure is mental accessibility, or the ease with which a brand comes to mind in purchasing situations. A comparison of scores for three mental accessibility metrics across age groups revealed differences primarily in associative penetration — a proxy for advertising reach.
Additional differences were found in other cognitive measures of advertising effectiveness, such as purchase funnel and product category knowledge. The results illustrate the potential limitations of advertising reach among older consumers. This underscores the importance of using cognitive measures to evaluate the effectiveness of inclusive cross-generational advertising strategies.
Neuropsychological aspects of perception
Activation of brain structures when viewing advertising
The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and primary visual areas are connected to the top-down attention system. For memory, the hippocampus is responsible for generating and processing memories. These brain regions are activated differently depending on the viewer’s educational background and cognitive abilities.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of 113 participants from two countries viewing 85 video commercials revealed patterns of activation across various psychological processes. These processes range from perception and language (information processing) to executive functions and memory (cognitive functions), as well as social cognition and emotion (social-affective response).
Emotional intelligence and advertising processing
Participants with high and low emotional intelligence (EI) paid attention to different types of advertising messages. The two EI groups showed a preference for advertising messages related to "people" or "objects." This suggests that differences in consumer perception and emotions may explain why certain advertising materials or marketing strategies are effective.
Electroencephalographic studies revealed theta synchronization (increase) and alpha desynchronization (decrease), indicating attentional encoding of episodic memory. Low-resolution source localization results revealed approaching responses to action- and emotion-based advertising, with activation of the left prefrontal and right parietal areas.
Neurophysiological responses to visual metaphors
A neurophysiological experiment assessed consumer responses to visual metaphors in advertising. EEG results revealed a positive relationship between cognitive load and conceptual complexity, unmediated by comprehension. This suggests that complexity serves as an indicator of the amount of cognitive resources required to process stimuli.
Eye-tracking results revealed significant differences in the time spent studying advertising. However, comprehension does not mediate these differences. The study helps analyze the appropriate use of visual metaphors and determine how to maximize their impact on advertising effectiveness.
Types of Advertising and Educational Differences
Digital Advertising and Education
Digital advertising is a marketing strategy adapted to digital platforms. Higher education students use the internet extensively for various purposes and often turn to it when making purchasing decisions. The study found significant differences in the assessed variables based on gender, age, and family income.
There is a negative correlation between attitude and skepticism, as well as between skepticism and purchase intention. Gender, family income, and advertising skepticism are significant predictors of purchase intention. The study provides insight into the relationships between attitude, skepticism, and purchase intention.
Social advertising and value-semantic perception
An empirical study of the value-semantic characteristics of social advertising perception among a group of students of both sexes revealed specific patterns. The study involved 200 students. The "Value Orientations" and "SJO" methods, as well as other diagnostic tools, were used.
Students’ perception of advertising was examined as a process of transmitting meanings condensed in advertising posters. Students’ semantic attitudes and life meanings when perceiving advertising posters varied depending on their educational profile. Students majoring in the humanities demonstrated specific patterns of perceiving social advertising at the value-semantic level.
Personalized advertising and social inequality
Socioeconomic status influences susceptibility to personalized advertising. Socioeconomic status becomes valuable information for effectively targeting specific, persuasive messages. Algorithms can identify individuals’ vulnerabilities, which for the less affluent may be a desire to thrive.
Social communication within online communities influences user perceptions and reactions to social media advertising. This study examines how social communication within online communities influences user perceptions and reactions to social media advertising. Educational level moderates these effects.
Practical implications for the advertising industry
Audience segmentation by education
Effective advertising strategies can boost sales and revenue for businesses. This is especially true when introducing new products or during promotions. Understanding educational differences in advertising perception allows for more targeted campaigns.
Advertising provides consumers with information about products and services, empowering them to make informed purchasing decisions based on product needs and brand preferences. Educated consumers demand more detailed, factual information, while less educated audiences respond better to emotional appeals.
Ethical considerations and regulation
Ethical concerns regarding surrogate advertising had a minimal impact on brand perception among participants. This highlights the need for media literacy initiatives and regulatory measures targeting young people. The results provide valuable insights for developing consumer loyalty strategies in the banking sector.
The study raises public policy questions regarding allowing advertising to potentially persuade people who lack a strong theory of mind. Marketers likely do not benefit from promoting a product in a manner that lacks transparency, forcing consumers to work hard to understand the message.
Development of educational programs
Schools can integrate media literacy into the curriculum by integrating lessons focusing on analyzing and evaluating media messages. This is achieved through specific modules that teach students to critically evaluate advertising, understand persuasive techniques, and recognize bias in media content.
Media literacy education strengthens critical thinking skills and empowers students to make informed decisions about media consumption. Students involved in media literacy programs demonstrate improved analytical skills and a greater understanding of the impact of advertising on their cognitive development.
Intercultural differences in perception
Cultural context and education
The study was conducted among respondents from three countries with different economic and cultural backgrounds — Germany, Turkey, and the United States. The results showed that the concept of attitude toward advertising generally depends on the type of advertising. The experiments revealed attitudinal differences toward advertising in general among the studied nations depending on the type of advertising.
Data were collected through a quantitative survey and experiment among university students. Culture and skepticism are correlated. These findings have implications for the potentially negative impact of advertising for practitioners, academics, and public policymakers.
Globalization and standardization of advertising
Social communication within online communities influences how users perceive advertising on social media. Educational level moderates the effects of social communication on advertising perceptions across cultures. Global brands must consider not only cultural but also educational differences when developing international campaigns.
A study of awareness and perceptions among a sample of 300 university students and 50 faculty members revealed differences in technology perceptions based on demographic variables. The results revealed varying levels of awareness and significant differences in perceptions across demographic variables, highlighting the importance of tailored implementation strategies.
Methodological approaches to research
Quantitative methods
Regression analysis revealed that perception of subliminal advertising has a significant impact on customer loyalty. Data was collected from 520 voluntary bank users via a questionnaire, a widely used quantitative research tool. The data were analyzed using parametric statistical methods, such as regression analysis, independent sample t-tests, and ANOVA, using SPSS 24.00.
Correlation results showed a strong association, with a correlation rating of 73.2%. The results indicated that institutional perception improves with more successful marketing campaigns. A regression study showed that school marketing tactics accounted for 53.6% of the institution’s favorable public perception.
Qualitative and mixed approaches
A phenomenological approach was used to examine how consumer behavior is shaped by deceptive advertising and its effect on consumer skepticism. Questions were designed to elicit thoughts and feelings about illegal, false, and misleading advertising. The current study reveals symbolic metaphors and highlights the significant meanings each informant attributed to their consumer experiences.
A mixed-methods research design was used to provide a comprehensive understanding of advertising’s impact on consumer behavior. The study’s results demonstrate that advertising has a significant impact on consumer behavior. The analysis revealed a positive correlation between advertising exposure, consumer attitudes, and purchase intentions.
Neuroscientific techniques
Electroencephalography, eye tracking, and functional MRI are used to study brain processes during advertising perception. These techniques provide objective data on attention, memory, and emotional responses. The study demonstrates the value of combining EEG and neuroscientific techniques with traditional marketing research methods.
Neuroimaging studies reveal activation of different brain regions depending on the type of advertising and viewer characteristics. These methods allow us to identify unconscious processes that influence advertising effectiveness.