Le Corbusier:
The Principles of Modernism and Its Legacy Automatic translate

Charles-Édouard Jeanneret-Gris, known by his pseudonym Le Corbusier, was born on October 6, 1887, in La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland, and died on August 27, 1965, near Cap Martin, France. He began using the pseudonym "Le Corbusier" regularly in 1920, initially as a signature in print and in his professional work. In 1930, he received French citizenship, already enjoying a well-established international reputation as an architect and publicist.

His early training focused on art school and artisanal skills, rather than a classical architectural academy, which greatly influenced his thinking. In his professional environment, he operated in several modes simultaneously: building design, urban planning, theory, graphics, and painting. This combination afforded a freedom rare for a practicing architect — he could simultaneously formulate theses and test them on the construction site.

Modernism as a program

For Le Corbusier, modernism wasn’t a style "for the facade," but a set of rules for working with the industrial era — reinforced concrete, mass production, construction speed, sanitation, and transportation. He sought to replace the familiar logic of "the house as tradition" with that of "the house as tool," where the demands of everyday life are described almost like technical specifications. In print, he spoke bluntly and concisely, often like an engineer tired of decorative justifications.

His modernism rested on several pillars: the framework, a free plan, standardization of components, clear proportions, and control of light. In practical terms, this meant shifting the "main decision" from the façade to the structure and layout, transforming the façade into a shell that could be altered without disrupting the scheme. Where the 19th century often worked through a massive wall, Le Corbusier preferred a framework and a plane, which made space more flexible.

Five points of a new architecture

In 1927, Le Corbusier formulated the "five points" of a new architecture as a set of specific techniques related to the reinforced concrete frame. These five included pylons (pilotis), roof gardens, free plans (free plan), ribbon windows, and a free façade (free façade). Importantly, he presented these points as "architectural facts" rather than whims of taste.

Pylons raised the main volume above the ground, freeing the lower level for passage, access, and airflow. The open-plan layout was supported by a framework: internal partitions could be repositioned without interfering with the load-bearing structure. The free-standing façade followed the same logic: the outer wall became a lightweight shell rather than a load-bearing barrier.

A ribbon window linked the lighting to the length of the façade rather than to a single opening, providing uniform light and a new way to perceive the room. The roof garden was interpreted as a reclamation of the space occupied by the building and as a way to improve the microclimate of the upper level. All five techniques worked as a system: each point supported the other, while individually they provided only an external citation.

A house like a machine

In his book "Vers une architecture" (1923), Le Corbusier advanced the formula "A house is a machine-à-habiter," usually translated as "A house is a machine for living." This statement is often perceived as a call for coldness, but in its original context, it is associated with hygiene, comfort, and the precise organization of everyday processes. For him, the machine was a metaphor for discipline: the house must function smoothly — light, water, heat, storage, and the movement of people around the apartment.

In his design practice, this led to the "programming" of space: entrance, kitchen, sanitary facilities, storage, ventilation, solar orientation. The idea was to ensure that everyday activities did not interfere with one another, as in a good production facility or a well-organized workshop. At the same time, he did not abandon aesthetics, but wanted form to flow from order, not ornament.

Villa Savoye and thesis testing

The Villa Savoye in Poissy, near Paris, was built between 1928 and 1931 and became one of the main demonstrations of the "five points" in residential design. The clients, Pierre and Eugénie Savoy, requested a modern country house, and the architect was given the opportunity to combine a framework, a free plan, and a promenade into a single building. The project’s history shows that the final design emerged from several iterations and revisions, not from a single "insight."

The house is raised on supports, and this elevation creates three effects at once: a freed-up lower level, visual lightness, and the independence of the residential volume from the site’s topography. The white "box" on pylons became a recognizable symbol of early modernism, but real-life use also revealed problems — for example, the demanding nature of flat roofs and components for high-quality waterproofing. Even here, the tension between theory and practice is evident: the thesis sounds clear, but construction and maintenance require compromise.

Material and concrete

During the interwar period, Le Corbusier actively used reinforced concrete as a structural base for open-plan designs and large openings. After World War II, concrete in his practice increasingly acquired a rough texture and became the visible "language" of the building, rather than a hidden framework beneath plaster. This change is usually attributed to the search for expressiveness and the realities of postwar construction, which required large volumes of housing and public buildings.

An important twist here is the understanding of concrete as a material that bears the marks of formwork, joints, and seams, that is, it records labor. In engineering terms, this is an honest acknowledgement of the technological chain: the structure is not disguised, but displayed. In everyday terms, this is simpler: the house doesn’t pretend to be a stone palace; it looks like what it’s actually made of.

Housing unit and vertical block type

The "Unité d’habitation" in Marseille was designed after the war; the final design was adopted in 1947, and it opened in 1952. The building comprises 330 apartments and public spaces, and its dimensions, as listed in foundation sources, are 135 meters long, 24 meters wide, and 56 meters high. The building is raised on supports, consistent with earlier principles, but the scale and social program are quite different.

From an engineering perspective, the "housing unit" is an attempt to assemble a standard apartment module into a larger unit and supplement it with shared services. In common parlance, it’s a "city within a building": elevators, "street" corridors, shops and common areas, and above all, a usable rooftop. This format has been controversial because it balances private life with shared spaces, which isn’t to everyone’s taste.

The Marseille project set a precedent for subsequent "Unité" designs elsewhere, but the Marseille building itself is often considered the most coherent example of this typology. It is valued not for the "idea of ​​community" as a slogan, but for its specific design solutions: double-height spaces in some apartments, thoughtful insolation, and the layout of the repeating module. However, operational experience has shown that the success of such a building depends on management, maintenance, and the quality of the public spaces — that is, on factors beyond pure form.

Proportions and "Modulor"

The Modulor is an anthropometric scale of proportions created by Le Corbusier as a tool for harmonizing dimensions and as a visual bridge between the metric and imperial systems of measurement. The system is based on a human figure 1.83 meters tall, with the height with the arm raised extended to 2.26 meters. He used this scale as a practical reference for assigning heights, steps, and the dimensions of furniture and components.

From a professional perspective, Modulor is an attempt to standardize proportions without directly copying historical orders. From a domestic perspective, it’s a "ruler with human numbers," where the size of a door or handrail is assessed based on body comfort rather than abstract geometry. Later critics noted the limitations of the original anthropometry, as it relies on a specific body type and fails to capture the diversity of bodies.

The city as an object of design

Le Corbusier approached the city as a problem of distributing functions, flows, and density, not as a sum of "beautiful streets." His urban plans prioritize transportation and a clear hierarchy of movement, separating pedestrians and cars by levels or routes. This is the approach of an organizational engineer: first the layout, then occupancy, then appearance.

This method had its strengths when it came to sanitation, insolation, adequate ventilation, and systemic infrastructure. But it also drew criticism for its rigidity and lack of sensitivity to the historical fabric, especially in areas where the city had already been established for centuries. As a result, its urban ideas often exist in fragments — the block grid, separate traffic flows, standardized buildings — rather than as a complete transfer of the plan to the existing city.

Chandigarh and the experience of a new capital

The Capitol Complex in Chandigarh is associated with Le Corbusier’s work in India and is dated between 1951 and 1965 in museum descriptions. The complex includes the High Court, Secretariat, and Legislative Assembly buildings, and the overall design emphasizes large public spaces and monumental volumes. The Legislative Assembly building itself was built beginning in 1951 and completed in 1962, with the opening ceremony taking place in 1964.

From an engineering perspective, Chandigarh is interesting because the climate and sun force us to work with shade, overhangs, façade depth, and ventilation, not just "pure geometry." In the usual formulation, this looks like this: concrete masses create shade, and shade provides comfort, and this is already part of the architecture. This experience demonstrates that Le Corbusier’s modernism could adapt to local conditions through structural and climatic solutions, even if the basic language remained recognizable.

Ronchamp and the Departure from Early Orthodoxy

The Chapel of Notre-Dame-du-Haut in Ronchamp dates back to 1950–1955. Construction began in 1950, with the main structure completed in 1953 and the official opening on June 25, 1955. The project was built on the site of a previous chapel, destroyed in 1944, and was designed to accommodate pilgrims. The architecture here relies on concrete, but the spatial logic differs sharply from the "white villas" of the 1920s.

In professional terms, Ronchamp is an example of a plastic composition where the wall functions as both a mass and a screen of light, and the form is assembled around acoustics, processionals, and side chapels. Simply put, it’s "a building that guides one through light and shadow," where emotion is created not by decoration but by geometry and lighting. This shift is often perceived as an expansion of modernist language: the rational foundation remains, but a freer plasticity is allowed.

Interdisciplinarity: painting, graphics, product design

Le Corbusier worked as an artist and designer alongside his architecture, a fact confirmed by encyclopedic surveys of his work. In his practice, drawing served not as decoration for a report, but as a means of searching for form and proportion — a fully-fledged working tool. This is evident in how the ideas of "plan" and "unfolding" transition from graphic design to volume and back again.

In a practical sense, his interdisciplinary approach was expressed in the design of furniture and interior details as part of the overall spatial concept. For the client, this created a sense of cohesion: the house and its objects "speak the same language," without any random stylistic overlaps. For the critic, this gave rise to controversy: the designer’s complete control sometimes stifles the diversity and improvisation of the residents.

Journalism and architectural rhetoric

Le Corbusier’s books and articles made him one of the most recognizable theorists of modernism, and encyclopedic sources directly point to his role as a writer and polemicist. His texts acted as an accelerator: the idea spread faster than buildings were constructed, transforming the professional landscape. The phrase "the house as a machine" became established precisely through print and repeated citations.

A hallmark of his rhetoric is a confident tone and a fondness for short, easy-to-remember phrases that are difficult to interpret. For a practicing architect, this is useful: the client quickly understands his position, and the project team receives a clear direction. For an opponent, it’s irritating: complex social problems don’t always fit into a slogan.

Criticism and controversial topics

Criticism of Le Corbusier often focuses on two points: his highly regulated urban doctrine and the question of social life in large-scale residential blocks. Urban plans built on functional separation and major thoroughfares are sometimes accused of weakening the "everyday life" of the street, where smaller functions blend naturally. Residential experiments like "Unité" are discussed through real-life experience: some are suited to a dense service environment, while others prefer a small house and a traditional neighborhood.

There’s also criticism of Modulor as a body standard, as the system relies on a specific anthropometric model and can exclude some users based on height, age, and abilities. This criticism is technically useful: it reminds us that ergonomics is about statistics and diversity, not a single "ideal" silhouette. At the same time, the very attempt to tie design dimensions to bodily experience remains understandable and practically justified, even if the initial parameters are debatable.

International recording of results

In 2016, 17 Le Corbusier buildings in seven countries were inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List as a serial transnational site titled "The Architectural Work of Le Corbusier, an Outstanding Contribution to the Modern Movement." The UNESCO description emphasizes that these 17 buildings demonstrate new concepts and significantly influenced the dissemination of modernist ideas across a wide geographical area. Examples specifically listed on the site page include the Villa Savoye, the Unité d’habitation in Marseille, and the chapel in Ronchamp.

In practical terms, this status creates a regime of protection and restoration work, where authentic materials, construction, and historical layers are essential. For researchers, this is a convenient "entry threshold": the list of objects forms a verified corpus of buildings, which museums, foundations, and security services work with. For the general public, this often becomes a route: seeing the various phases of the artist’s work — from white villas to late sculpture and large public complexes.

Terms and principles associated with Le Corbusier

The set of stable concepts surrounding Le Corbusier is usually associated with the "five points," the house-machine formula, and the "Modulor" as a system of proportions. These elements are sometimes used out of context, as decorative labels, but in their original logic, they are linked to construction and a way of life. If a project lacks the freedom of a framework or does not truly address light and everyday life, then the "ribbon window" and pylons quickly become meaningless quotations.

For professional reading, it’s useful to keep another point in mind: Le Corbusier’s early, rigorous designs and his later, plastic forms coexist in the same biography, and this isn’t a mistake, but an evolution of goals and scale. The transition from private villas to collective housing and to state architecture changes the design, the language, and the permissible level of expression. Therefore, it’s more accurate to view his principles as a set of working tools rather than as a single, "eternal" style.

Reference data

Le Corbusier was a Swiss-French architect, urban planner, artist, and writer, born in 1887 and died in 1965. The Villa Savoye in Poissy dates from 1928–31 and is often described as a building that particularly clearly embodies the "five points" of modern architecture. The "Unité d’habitation" in Marseille dates from the postwar period, contains 330 apartments, and opened in 1952.

The Chapel of Notre-Dame-du-Haut in Ronchamp was inaugurated on June 25, 1955, after work began in 1950. The Chandigarh Capitol Complex is dated in museum descriptions between 1951 and 1965, and the Legislative Assembly was built from 1951 to 1962 and inaugurated in 1964. In 2016, 17 of Le Corbusier’s buildings were inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage List as a serial site, distributed across seven countries.