Existentialism in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground Automatic translate

Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground occupies a special place in the history of world literature and philosophical thought. Created in 1864, the work became a kind of bridge between the Russian realistic tradition of the 19th century and the existential philosophical trends of the 20th century. The story anticipated many key themes and motifs of existentialism, which allowed modern researchers to speak of Dostoevsky as a forerunner of this philosophical movement.

The central character of the work, the nameless underground man, embodies the type of personality that would become the focus of future existential thinkers. His painful self-awareness, tormented reflection on his own existence, and alienation from society would become the characteristic features of an existential hero. Walter Kaufman rightly called Notes from Underground “the best introduction to existentialism ever written.”

Historical context and philosophical background

The creation of Notes from Underground coincided with a turning point in Dostoevsky’s creative evolution. After his penal experience, the writer rethought many of his previous convictions and turned to the study of the deep contradictions of human nature. The work arose in an atmosphere of heated ideological debates in the 1860s, when Russian society was experiencing a crisis of traditional values ​​against the backdrop of great reforms.

The most important impetus for the creation of the story was the polemic with utilitarian theories, primarily with the ideas of Nikolai Chernyshevsky, set out in the novel What Is to Be Done?. Dostoevsky decisively rejected rationalistic ideas about man as a being whose behavior is determined by a reasonable calculation of benefit. The underground hero rebels against such schemes, asserting the fundamental irrationality of human nature.

The philosophical context of the era was marked by a crisis of Enlightenment rationalism. In Europe, voices were already being heard of thinkers who questioned the omnipotence of reason. Søren Kierkegaard in Denmark criticized Hegel’s system from the standpoint of individual existence, Arthur Schopenhauer in Germany developed a pessimistic philosophy of the will. Dostoevsky may not have been directly familiar with their works, but his artistic insights are surprisingly consonant with their philosophical intuitions.

The phenomenon of the underground man as an existential type

Dostoevsky’s Underground Man embodies a specific type of consciousness that would later become the object of intense attention by existential philosophers. This consciousness is characterized by hypertrophied reflexivity, constant self-analysis, and a morbid sensitivity to any manifestations of inauthenticity.

The hero characterizes himself as a person who is “too conscious.” This excessive consciousness becomes the source of his suffering, since it deprives him of the ability to act directly. The Underground Man analyzes his every action, every impulse, falling into a vicious circle of reflection. This state anticipates the existential concept of a person’s “abandonment” in a world where he is forced to constantly choose and bear responsibility for his choice.

The suspiciousness and touchiness of the hero, whom the author compares to a "hunchback or a dwarf", reflect his deep alienation from the social world. He cannot find his place in society, he feels like an outsider among "normal" people. This alienation is not only social, but also ontological - the hero experiences the fundamental loneliness of human existence.

The paradoxical nature of the underground man’s consciousness is manifested in his ability to simultaneously affirm and deny the same positions. He says of himself: "I am an evil man… I was an evil official… I lied about myself the other day that I was an evil official. I lied out of malice." Such logic of contradictions will become a characteristic feature of existential thinking, rejecting formal consistency for the sake of the living truth of existence.

Freedom as a Curse and a Gift

The central theme of Notes from Underground is the problem of human freedom, which will become the cornerstone of existential philosophy. The Underground Man acts as a fierce defender of freedom against any attempts to limit it - scientific, social or moral.

The hero’s famous protest against the mathematical certainty of "two times two is four" symbolizes the denial of any external coercion, even logical. "Two times two is four looks like a dandy, stands across your path with his hands on his hips and spits," says the underground man, expressing deep indignation at attempts to reduce human existence to rational formulas.

The hero asserts the human right to a "whim", to actions that contradict common sense and personal gain. He is ready to prefer destruction and chaos to the mechanical well-being of the "crystal palace" - a utopian society built on the principles of rational egoism. This position anticipates the existential understanding of freedom as a fundamental characteristic of human existence, not subject to any restrictions.

However, freedom in the underground man’s understanding turns out to be a heavy burden. He suffers from the infinity of possibilities for choice, from the need to constantly decide and bear responsibility for his decisions. This suffering anticipates the existential concept of "anxiety" as an inevitable companion of free existence.

The absurdity and irrationality of existence

The Underground Man discovers the fundamental absurdity of human existence long before this theme becomes central to Albert Camus’s work. The hero states with bitter irony that "everything can be said about world history, everything that even the most disordered imagination can come up with. The only thing that cannot be said is what is reasonable."

This thought contains in its germ the entire future philosophy of the absurd. The underground man understands that attempts to find a rational meaning in human actions and historical events are doomed to failure. The world does not obey logic, history moves not according to rational laws, but according to the incomprehensible impulses of the human will.

The absurdity of existence is especially clearly manifested in the behavior of the hero himself. He commits acts that cause him suffering, and at the same time he is aware of their destructiveness. In the second part of the story, the underground man demonstrates an amazing ability for self-abasement and self-destruction, which can be interpreted as a rebellion against the rational logic of behavior.

Suffering as a way of self-affirmation

One of the most paradoxical ideas of the underground man is the apology of suffering. He claims that "man sometimes loves suffering terribly, to the point of passion, and this is a fact." Suffering is not seen as an evil to be avoided, but as the only guarantee of human dignity and freedom.

"Suffering - this is the only cause of consciousness," the hero declares. This statement contains a deep existential intuition: it is through suffering that man realizes his uniqueness and difference from the natural world. Suffering testifies to the fact that man cannot be reduced to biological or social functions.

The Underground Man prefers conscious suffering to unconscious happiness. He says: “Even though consciousness produces the same result, that is, there will be nothing to do, at least you can sometimes beat yourself up, and that still gives you some life.” This masochistic logic reflects the desire for an authentic existence, even if it is painful, as opposed to a comfortable but inauthentic life.

Anticipation of existential motives

The connection between Notes from Underground and future existentialism is evident in a number of themes and motifs that will become central to this philosophical movement. First of all, this concerns the problematic of individual existence, which was the focus of Søren Kierkegaard.

Like the Danish philosopher, Dostoevsky’s underground man opposes living individuality to abstract systems and general concepts. He does not want to dissolve into the masses, to become part of a collective whole. His rebellion is directed against all forms of "omnipotence", against attempts to subordinate the individual to general laws.

Friedrich Nietzsche saw in the Underground Man a harbinger of his "superman." Indeed, Dostoevsky’s hero displays "the will to power" in his desire to assert his own exceptionalism. However, if Nietzschean superman directs this will toward overcoming himself and creating new values, then the Underground Man turns it against himself, becoming a victim of his own reflection.

Jean-Paul Sartre will see in the underground man the embodiment of "bad faith" - an attempt to escape from freedom and responsibility through self-deception. Dostoevsky’s hero is indeed in constant conflict with his own freedom: he simultaneously affirms it as the highest value and suffers from its burden.

Albert Camus acknowledged Dostoevsky’s direct influence on the formation of his philosophy of the absurd. The Underground Man can be seen as a precursor to the hero of The Stranger - a man who cannot find rational grounds for his existence and nevertheless continues to live.

Critique of rationalism and utilitarianism

Notes from Underground contains a devastating critique of the rationalistic conceptions of man popular in the 19th century. Underground Man rejects outright the idea that human behavior is determined by rational calculations of self-interest. He insists that man often acts contrary to his own interests, guided by irrational impulses.

The hero ridicules the utilitarian formula of “the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.” He asks: “Why are you so firmly, so solemnly convinced that only one normal and positive thing — in a word, only one well-being — is beneficial to man?” This criticism anticipates the existential rejection of any attempt to reduce human existence to external criteria of success or happiness.

The underground man asserts the right to "disadvantageous" behavior, to actions that contradict common sense. He is ready to harm himself only to prove his independence from rational schemes. "Should the world go to hell, or should I not drink tea? I will say that the world should go to hell, but that I should always drink tea!" he declares.

Religious and philosophical intuitions

Although Notes from Underground does not contain direct religious motives, the work contains deep religious and philosophical intuitions that will be developed in Dostoevsky’s later novels. The Underground Man experiences what can be called a "religious experience in reverse" - he feels the emptiness of a world devoid of higher meaning.

The hero suffers from the absence of absolute values, from the impossibility of finding a solid support for his existence. This suffering anticipates the existential problematic of the "death of God" and the crisis of values ​​associated with it. As Nietzsche would later say, "God is dead," and man is left alone in the face of a meaningless world.

The Underground Man experiences what Kierkegaard called the "sickness unto death" - the despair of being unable to find a true existence. He can neither accept the world as it is, nor change it to suit his own ideas of what should be.

The religious theme in Notes is present in a hidden form through the motif of sin and redemption. The Underground Man feels guilty, but does not know what exactly his guilt is. This existential guilt is different from moral or legal guilt - it is connected with the very fact of existence in a world devoid of higher meaning.

Literary and artistic features

The form of confession chosen by Dostoevsky for Notes from Underground organically corresponds to the existential content of the work. The subjective first-person narration allows the reader to immerse himself in the hero’s inner world and experience his existential problems from within.

The confessional form emphasizes the fundamental importance of individual experience as opposed to objective knowledge. The Underground Man does not claim to have the ultimate truth – he speaks only of his personal experience of existence. This subjectivity will become a characteristic feature of existential literature.

The paradoxical logic of the presentation reflects the contradictory nature of the subject of the depiction itself - human existence. Dostoevsky shows that living truth cannot be expressed in a logically consistent form. It requires a special language capable of conveying all the complexity and contradictoriness of existential experience.

The psychological realism of the "Notes" reaches such depth that external events recede into the background. The main subject of the depiction becomes the inner life of the hero - his thoughts, feelings, experiences. This shift in emphasis from the external to the internal will become a characteristic feature of existential literature.

The dialectic of authentic and inauthentic existence

The Underground Man suffers from the split between authentic and inauthentic existence, which will become a central theme of existential philosophy, especially in the work of Martin Heidegger. The hero is acutely aware of his own inauthenticity, but cannot find a way to an authentic life.

In the first part of the story, the underground man analyzes the phenomenon of “normal” people – those who live according to social conventions and do not ask existential questions. He envies their ability to act directly, but at the same time despises their spiritual blindness. This ambivalence reflects the complexity of the problem of authenticity: the path to genuine existence turns out to be extremely painful.

The second part of the work demonstrates the hero’s inability to genuine human communication. His meetings with former classmates and the prostitute Lisa show how existential reflection can become an obstacle to living human relationships. The underground man analyzes his every feeling, every action, which deprives him of the ability to be spontaneous.

Time and existence

Notes from Underground contains a specific experience of time that anticipates existential temporality. The Underground Man does not live in objective, measurable time, but in internal, psychological time. His existence is characterized by a gap between past, present, and future.

The hero constantly returns to the past, reliving old grievances and humiliations. He cannot forgive himself for many of his actions, which turns his present into an endless repetition of past suffering. The future seems either empty or threatening to him. This specific temporality reflects the existential problem of man’s "abandonment" in time.

The underground existence is characterized by the stoppage of time, the transformation of life into a frozen state of reflection. The hero does not develop, does not move forward - he marks time, chewing over the same thoughts and experiences. This state anticipates the existential concept of "bad infinity" - existence without development and growth.

Social and philosophical aspects

Notes from Underground contains a sharp critique of Dostoevsky’s contemporary society, which takes on existential dimensions. The Underground Man rejects not only specific social institutions, but also the very idea of ​​sociality as such. He experiences a fundamental loneliness that cannot be overcome by any form of social organization.

The hero criticizes bourgeois civilization for its mechanicalness and lack of spirituality. The image of the "crystal palace" symbolizes a utopian society built on the principles of rational organization, but deprived of human warmth and individuality. The underground man prefers chaos and destruction to such mechanical order.

The hero’s social alienation is not accidental but fundamental. He cannot and does not want to integrate into society, since this would require renouncing his individuality. This position anticipates the existential critique of "mass society" and conformism.

Influence on world culture

The influence of Notes from Underground on world culture of the 20th century is difficult to overestimate. Dostoevsky’s work became a kind of canon for many writers and thinkers who developed existential issues.

In literature, the image of the underground man found its continuation in the works of such authors as Franz Kafka, Jean-Paul Sartre, Albert Camus, Saul Bellow. All of them, each in their own way, developed the theme of the alienated individual, unable to find his place in the modern world.

In philosophy, Dostoevsky’s work influenced the formation of the basic concepts of existentialism. Lev Shestov saw in the Underground Man the embodiment of his philosophy of "groundlessness" and criticism of rationalism. Nikolai Berdyaev found in him an example of the tragedy of the creative personality in the modern world.

In psychology, Notes from Underground anticipated many discoveries of depth psychology. Freudian analysis of subconscious motives of behavior, Jungian concept of "shadow", existential psychotherapy - all these trends find in Dostoevsky’s work rich material for reflection.

Contemporary relevance

In the 21st century, Notes from Underground remains relevant as an artistic exploration of the existential problems of modern man. The information society, with its limitless possibilities of communication, paradoxically increases individual loneliness and alienation.

The underground man of the 21st century is an Internet user who spends hours in virtual space, analyzing each of his posts on social networks, suffering from comparing his life with the idealized images of other people. The hyper-reflexivity of modern man, his inability to directly experience make the image of the underground man surprisingly modern.

The crisis of traditional values, characteristic of the postmodern era, actualizes the existential problems of the "Notes". Modern man, like Dostoevsky’s hero, is forced to independently construct the meaning of his existence in a world deprived of ready-made answers.

The problem of authenticity in the era of social networks and consumer culture is particularly acute. The underground man with his morbid desire for authenticity turns out to be unexpectedly close to the modern reader, who is looking for his real self among many social roles and masks.

Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground is a unique artistic and philosophical work that anticipated the main themes and motifs of existentialism. The Underground Man became the archetypal image of an existential hero - an individual experiencing fundamental loneliness and alienation in the modern world.

Dostoevsky’s work reveals central existential themes: the problem of freedom and responsibility, the absurdity of existence, the search for authenticity, the dialectic of suffering and consciousness. All these motives will be further developed in the works of the greatest existential philosophers and writers of the 20th century.

The artistic form of the "Notes" - a first-person confession - organically corresponds to their existential content. The subjectivity of the narrative, the paradoxical logic, the psychological depth of the analysis make the work an example of existential literature.

The influence of Notes from Underground on world culture is enormous. The work became a source of inspiration for many writers, philosophers and psychologists who developed the problems of human existence. In the modern world, experiencing a crisis of traditional values ​​and increasing individual alienation, Dostoevsky’s work retains its relevance as a profound study of human existential problems.