Jean Alaux – Emancipation of the Serfs by Louis X in July 1315 ; Philip IV the Fair establishes Parliament in Paris in 1303 [lower] *Château de Versailles
Château de Versailles(upper) – Jean Alaux -- Emancipation of the Serfs by Louis X in July 1315 ; Philip IV the Fair establishes Parliament in Paris in 1303 [lower] 91х83, 67х122
The composition presents two distinct historical scenes arranged vertically within a lavishly ornamented frame. The upper scene depicts what appears to be a formal ceremony taking place indoors, likely within a grand hall or palace. A central figure, presumably the reigning monarch, is seated on an elevated throne, surrounded by courtiers and attendants. Several individuals kneel before him in postures of submission or reverence. The artist has rendered these figures with considerable detail, emphasizing their elaborate attire and expressions of deference. Light streams through arched windows behind the throne, illuminating the scene and creating a sense of solemnity. A banner is affixed to the right side of this upper panel, bearing an inscription that identifies the event as relating to the liberation of serfs under a royal decree. The lower section portrays another formal gathering, but with a different atmosphere. Here we see a group of men seated at long tables, seemingly engaged in legal or administrative proceedings. The dominant color scheme is red and gold, suggesting authority and wealth. A central figure, likely the monarch responsible for this event, stands observing the assembly. This scene conveys an impression of institutional establishment – the creation of a formal body or parliament within a city setting. An inscription below identifies this as the founding of a parliamentary institution by another royal figure. The juxtaposition of these two scenes is significant. The upper panel highlights a moment of potential social reform, with the monarch seemingly bestowing freedom upon a subjugated population. The lower scene, conversely, emphasizes the consolidation of power through legal and administrative structures. The framing device itself contributes to the overall meaning; its ornate nature suggests that both events are considered pivotal moments in the nation’s history, worthy of commemoration and display. Subtleties within the painting suggest a complex narrative beyond the surface depiction of royal acts. The expressions on the faces of those kneeling in the upper scene hint at a mixture of relief and uncertainty – the implications of newfound freedom may not be entirely clear or positive. Similarly, the lower panel’s portrayal of the assembled officials could imply both progress and potential for future conflict arising from formalized legal processes. The overall effect is one of presenting historical events as carefully orchestrated displays of royal authority, while subtly hinting at the complexities and ambiguities inherent in such moments of societal change.
This site exists due to advertising revenue. Turn off Adblock, please!
Random pics
Jean Alaux -- Emancipation of the Serfs by Louis X in July 1315 ; Philip IV the Fair establishes Parliament in Paris in 1303 [lower] — Château de Versailles (upper)
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд. Информация появится в новом окне, если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
You cannot comment Why?
The lower section portrays another formal gathering, but with a different atmosphere. Here we see a group of men seated at long tables, seemingly engaged in legal or administrative proceedings. The dominant color scheme is red and gold, suggesting authority and wealth. A central figure, likely the monarch responsible for this event, stands observing the assembly. This scene conveys an impression of institutional establishment – the creation of a formal body or parliament within a city setting. An inscription below identifies this as the founding of a parliamentary institution by another royal figure.
The juxtaposition of these two scenes is significant. The upper panel highlights a moment of potential social reform, with the monarch seemingly bestowing freedom upon a subjugated population. The lower scene, conversely, emphasizes the consolidation of power through legal and administrative structures. The framing device itself contributes to the overall meaning; its ornate nature suggests that both events are considered pivotal moments in the nation’s history, worthy of commemoration and display.
Subtleties within the painting suggest a complex narrative beyond the surface depiction of royal acts. The expressions on the faces of those kneeling in the upper scene hint at a mixture of relief and uncertainty – the implications of newfound freedom may not be entirely clear or positive. Similarly, the lower panel’s portrayal of the assembled officials could imply both progress and potential for future conflict arising from formalized legal processes. The overall effect is one of presenting historical events as carefully orchestrated displays of royal authority, while subtly hinting at the complexities and ambiguities inherent in such moments of societal change.