Château de Versailles – Jacques Berto -- Prise du palais des Tuileries, 10 août 1792
1793
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The composition is dominated by swirling clouds of smoke emanating from several points within the scene, obscuring details but contributing to an atmosphere of intense upheaval and destruction. Flames lick at the edges of buildings visible on the right side of the frame, indicating structural damage and further escalating the sense of devastation.
A group of figures, distinguishable by their tricolor flags and more informal attire, advances through the melee. One man, mounted on a horse, appears to be rallying or directing this contingent. The dynamism of his posture – leaning forward with an outstretched arm – suggests urgency and leadership amidst the disorder. Several individuals are engaged in close-quarters combat; some wield weapons while others appear to be struggling or falling.
The architecture itself is significant. A large, classical building forms a backdrop to the action, its scale emphasizing the magnitude of the event. The presence of such an imposing structure – likely a palace or governmental building – implies that this conflict involves not just military engagement but also a symbolic struggle for power and control.
Subtleties in the rendering suggest a deliberate attempt to portray both brutality and heroism. While the scene is undeniably violent, the artist has avoided depicting explicit gore, instead focusing on the overall impression of chaos and loss. The lighting – a combination of harsh sunlight and smoky shadows – heightens the dramatic effect and contributes to the emotional intensity of the moment.
The painting seems to be a visual record of a pivotal event, likely marking a shift in power or a significant turning point in a revolution. It is not merely an illustration of battle but rather a commentary on the cost of upheaval and the complexities of revolutionary change.