Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin – Felling 1880 38, 5h55, 3
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
COMMENTS: 1 Ответы
Как всё детально нарисовано. Прекрасно! Восхищение переполняет!
You cannot comment Why?
The artist’s handling of light contributes significantly to the paintings impact. Patches of sunlight filter through the remaining trees in the background, illuminating sections of the devastation while leaving others shrouded in shadow. This interplay creates a visual contrast between the vitality of the untouched forest and the destruction wrought upon the foreground. The color palette is dominated by greens and browns, but these are rendered with considerable variation – from the deep, almost black tones of the shadowed areas to the brighter, more vibrant hues where light falls.
Beyond the literal depiction of logging, the work seems to carry a subtext concerning humanity’s impact on nature. The scale of the destruction is overwhelming; it suggests an industrial process operating on a large and potentially unsustainable level. The absence of human figures amplifies this sense of impersonal force – the act of felling feels less like individual labor and more like a relentless, almost mechanical operation.
The remaining trees in the background, though seemingly distant, serve as a poignant reminder of what has been lost. They represent not only continued life but also an implicit critique of the actions depicted in the foreground. The overall effect is one of loss, disruption, and a quiet lament for a natural world undergoing profound transformation. It’s a visual statement about progress, perhaps, but one tinged with a palpable sense of regret.