Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin – In the thicket 1870 24. 2h32. 5
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The artist depicted an abundance of undergrowth – a profusion of ferns and other leafy plants – that obscures much of the ground plane. The foliage is rendered with a nervous energy, lines overlapping and intertwining to create a sense of claustrophobia and impenetrable depth. Light seems to filter through the canopy in scattered patches, creating areas of relative brightness that contrast sharply with the darker recesses within the thicket.
The overall effect is one of wildness and untamed nature. The lack of any discernible human presence reinforces this impression; the scene feels remote and untouched. One might interpret the drawing as a meditation on the power and resilience of natural forms, or perhaps an exploration of the psychological impact of being immersed in such a dense environment. The emphasis on texture and line suggests a focus on the immediate sensory experience – the feel of dampness, the smell of earth, the visual complexity of the foliage.
The drawing’s monochromatic palette contributes to its somber mood, evoking a sense of quiet contemplation rather than exuberant celebration. It is not merely a depiction of a woodland; it seems intended to convey an atmosphere – one of solitude and perhaps even a touch of melancholy.