Child with a Whip Pierre-Auguste Renoir (1841-1919)
Pierre-Auguste Renoir – Child with a Whip
Edit attribution
Download full size: 801×1122 px (0,2 Mb)
Painter: Pierre-Auguste Renoir
Pierre Auguste Renoir painted his painting The Child with the Whip in 1885, at a time when he himself was already 44 years old. At that time, the artist was already established painter, his paintings were widely known, and a talent recognized by all. Interestingly, the venerable artists either did not write children’s portraits at all, or their paintings showed the scaled-down adults, not revealing the rich and unique world of the child. Renoir painted children in a completely different way.
Description of the painting "The Child with the Whip" by Pierre-Auguste Renoir
Pierre Auguste Renoir painted his painting The Child with the Whip in 1885, at a time when he himself was already 44 years old. At that time, the artist was already established painter, his paintings were widely known, and a talent recognized by all.
Interestingly, the venerable artists either did not write children’s portraits at all, or their paintings showed the scaled-down adults, not revealing the rich and unique world of the child.
Renoir painted children in a completely different way. Children in his paintings live their lives, in children’s faces childish emotions, in the eyes - curiosity and playfulness inherent in young age, and the whole picture does not torment the mind inconsistency written image and this child.
This Renoir canvas depicts a full-length portrait of a child. You can see that the child is from a wealthy family - neat shoes, tied a bow, socks, light clothing, not constraining the movements. But the main thing in the portrait, of course, not that.
Especially the artist has highlighted the child’s face, painting it with a contrasting reality in comparison to the clothes themselves and the surrounding nature - they are painted with light, careless brushstrokes.
Contemplating the painting, one gets the feeling that the little man is waiting for a question or an address. He was busy with his important things - playing with the whip, but stopped for a moment to find out what he wants from these incomprehensible adults. Of course, the adults called him over some nonsense, because they do not understand how busy the hero of the picture. That’s why the child’s lips are so folded and his gaze so intense.
Interestingly, there’s no definitive answer to the question of who is depicted, a boy or a girl. Long curls, a knee-length dress, dark shoes - so at the time of the painting both girls and boys of this age were dressed. However, each response gives the painting its own connotation of what is seen. If the girl in the painting is a girl, she is a small, determined ruler.
Not without reason, she holds a whip in her hand, her hair is loose, and her whole posture, and even her clenched fist, speaks of confidence and determination. Such characteristics are characteristic of a boy. If it is a boy, the lace collars, the delicate gown, the long curls look in contrast.
Renoir knew how to intrigue and chained his admirers to his creations.
Кому понравилось
Пожалуйста, подождите
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
You need to login
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).



















You cannot comment Why?
The background is rendered in an impressionistic style, characterized by broken brushstrokes and a vibrant palette. A profusion of foliage and flowers creates a sense of depth and atmosphere, though specific details remain indistinct. The light appears diffused, bathing the scene in a soft glow that minimizes harsh shadows.
Several layers of interpretation arise from this depiction. The child’s direct gaze conveys an unsettling mixture of innocence and authority. The presence of the whip introduces a complex element – it is unclear whether it is being used playfully or with intent. This ambiguity generates a tension between the perceived vulnerability of childhood and a nascent sense of power or control.
The setting, seemingly idyllic, contrasts with the potential implications of the object held by the child. The abundance of nature suggests freedom and joy, yet the whip introduces an element of constraint or dominance that disrupts this harmony. This juxtaposition invites consideration of themes related to authority, innocence, and the complexities inherent in childhood development.
The artist’s technique further contributes to the paintings layered meaning. The loose brushwork and vibrant colors create a sense of immediacy and spontaneity, while also obscuring precise details, allowing for multiple interpretations. The overall effect is one of quiet contemplation, prompting viewers to question the nature of power and its manifestation even within seemingly innocent contexts.