Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1908-1918 – 1914 Compotier, verre, bouteille, fruits (Nature morte verte)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The arrangement appears deliberately disordered; forms are disrupted and reassembled, defying conventional perspective. A bowl sits precariously on what seems to be a draped table, its shape distorted and flattened. Adjacent to it is a tall vessel, similarly deconstructed into planes and lines that suggest both solidity and instability. Further elements – a small cup with a vibrant red interior, a cluster of fruit or foliage contained within an angular form – are scattered across the surface, their individual identities blurred by the artist’s treatment.
The composition lacks a clear focal point; instead, the eye is drawn to various areas, following the lines and shapes as they intersect and overlap. This creates a sense of visual restlessness, preventing the viewer from settling on any single interpretation. The use of sharp angles and abrupt transitions contributes to this effect, generating a dynamic tension within the seemingly static scene.
The artist’s choice of subject matter – a still life – is significant. Traditionally associated with contemplation and quiet observation, here it is transformed into something more complex and unsettling. The familiar objects are stripped of their everyday associations, becoming symbols of fragmentation and disorientation.
Theres a sense that the depicted space isnt merely observed but actively dismantled and reconfigured. This suggests an exploration of perception itself – how we construct meaning from visual information and how easily that construction can be disrupted. The presence of a framed mirror on the left edge, reflecting what appears to be a scattering of yellow objects, further reinforces this theme of distorted reality and multiple perspectives.
The overall effect is one of intellectual challenge rather than aesthetic pleasure. It’s not an invitation to simply appreciate beauty but to actively engage with the artists process of deconstruction and reinterpretation.