Pablo Picasso Period of creation: 1908-1918 – 1913 Personnage arlequinesque (Arlequin)
На эту операцию может потребоваться несколько секунд.
Информация появится в новом окне,
если открытие новых окон не запрещено в настройках вашего браузера.
Для работы с коллекциями – пожалуйста, войдите в аккаунт (open in new window).
Поделиться ссылкой в соцсетях:
You cannot comment Why?
The figure appears to be standing, though its posture is ambiguous due to the fractured representation. A suggestion of a head can be discerned at the upper portion, indicated by a flattened oval with what might be interpreted as facial features – a dark marking suggesting an eye or nose. The body is constructed from rectangular and trapezoidal blocks, some projecting forward, others receding into the background. These planes are not uniformly colored; subtle gradations in tone suggest volume and depth despite the overall flattening of space.
The artist employed a system of lines to further delineate these geometric forms. Thin black lines trace the edges of the planes, emphasizing their separation while simultaneously contributing to the sense of fragmentation. Some lines appear to be directional, hinting at movement or an implied gesture, though this is difficult to ascertain with certainty given the overall abstraction.
The background is similarly fragmented and ambiguous, lacking a clear horizon line or spatial cues. It seems to merge with the figure itself, blurring the boundaries between subject and setting. This lack of differentiation contributes to the painting’s unsettling quality, denying the viewer any easy point of reference.
Subtextually, the work appears to explore themes of identity and perception. The deconstruction of the human form suggests a questioning of conventional representations of selfhood. By dismantling the figure into its constituent parts, the artist seems to be challenging the notion of a unified, stable identity. The ambiguity inherent in the composition invites multiple interpretations; the viewer is left to actively reconstruct the image and assign meaning to the fragmented forms. There’s an underlying sense of melancholy or isolation conveyed through the muted color scheme and the figures apparent detachment from its surroundings. The work can be read as a commentary on the complexities of human experience, suggesting that identity is not fixed but rather a collection of shifting perspectives and fractured realities.